专题

恋爱关系中的权力来源、流动和效应

  • 刘诗雨 ,
  • 旭古日根 ,
  • 严文华 ,
  • 张云婕 ,
  • 高诗媛 ,
  • 刘彦汐 ,
  • 肖若兰 ,
  • 许多
展开
  • 1华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海 200062;
    2华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海市心理健康与危机干预重点实验室,上海 200062
刘诗雨,华东师范大学 2020 级应用心理学本科生,主要研究方向为亲密关系。旭古日根,华东师范大学 2020 级应用心理学学士,主要研究方向为亲密关系。
#作者对本文有同等贡献和付出
* 严文华,whyan@psy.ecnu.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2024-10-12

基金资助

横向课题:天然钻石协会

Resources, Flow, and Effects of Power in Romantic Relationships

  • LIU Shiyu ,
  • XU Gurigen ,
  • YAN Wenhua ,
  • ZHANG Yunjie ,
  • GAO Shiyuan ,
  • LIU Yanxi ,
  • XIAO Ruolan ,
  • XU Duo
Expand
  • 1School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
    2 School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, Shanghai 200062, China
#Equal contributors
* YAN Wenhua, whyan@psy.ecnu.edu.cn

Online published: 2024-10-12

摘要

目的:探究恋爱关系中的权力,了解恋爱关系中权力的来源、流动及效应,建构恋爱关系中权力的理论模型。
方法:采用质性研究方法,对10个城市的10对恋人进行深度访谈,并运用扎根理论分析访谈资料。
结果:恋爱关系中的权力来自于双方关系与环境中的多种因素,会随着时间与场景的改变产生流动,并对认知、行为产生影响。恋爱关系中双方所具有的权力高低并不直接决定其恋爱关系满意度,而是个体实际的权力高低是否符合权力需求,影响了恋爱双方的和谐程度和自身的恋爱关系满意度。
结论:恋爱关系中的权力以包含权力来源、流动及效应的权力状态形成模型为发展主要模式,个体的实际权力与自身权力需求是否匹配在恋爱体验中起到重要作用。

本文引用格式

刘诗雨 , 旭古日根 , 严文华 , 张云婕 , 高诗媛 , 刘彦汐 , 肖若兰 , 许多 . 恋爱关系中的权力来源、流动和效应[J]. 心理学通讯, 2024 , 7(1) : 47 -56 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.224007

Abstract

Objective: To explore the power dynamics in romantic relationships by examining the sources, flow, and effects of power, and to construct a theoretical model of power in romantic relationships.
Methods: Using qualitative research methods, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 pairs of couples from 10 different cities. Grounded theory was employed to analyze the interview data.
Results: The power in romantic relationships originates from various factors within the relationship and the environment. It fluctuates over time and across different scenarios, impacting cognition and behavior. The power balance between partners does not directly determine relationship satisfaction. Instead, the alignment between an individual’s actual power and their power needs affects the harmony of the relationship and personal satisfaction.
Conclusion: The development of power in romantic relationships can be modeled by incorporating the sources, flow, and effects of power. The match between an individual's actual power and their power needs plays a crucial role in their romantic experience.

参考文献

[1] 陈亚青. (2013). 中国家庭夫妻权力分配模式的心理学研究(硕士学位论文). 曲阜师范大学.
[2] 成绮莉, 门辉华, 刘路遥. (2021). 权力感对亲密关系满意度的影响: 社会比较倾向和冲突应对方式的链式中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志,29(12), 1900-1906. doi:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2021.12.031
[3] 何赏赏, 吴宝沛. (2021). 依恋回避对愤怒抑制的影响: 亲密关系权力感的中介作用. 心理技术与应用, 9(5), 300-305, 312. doi:10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2021.05.005
[4] 贾骏怡. (2019). 夫妻权力的让渡与转移研究——以L县10对已婚青年夫妻为例(硕士学位论文). 中国青年政治学院, 北京.
[5] 李静雅. (2016). 社会性别视角下夫妻权力影响因素比较研究——以福建省妇女社会地位调查数据为例. 集美大学学报(哲社版), 19(4), 81-90, 121.
[6] 李仲武, 冯学良. (2021). 女性家庭地位越高就越幸福吗? 统计研究,38(10), 121-133. doi:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2021.10.010
[7] 刘旭. (2017). 恋爱关系中社会交换的不平衡状态研究(硕士学位论文). 河北大学, 保定.
[8] 宋丹丹. (2017). 亲密关系中的权力感知研究(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
[9] 陶春芳, 蒋永萍. (1993). 中国妇女社会地位概观. 北京: 中国妇女出版社.
[10] 王浩, 俞国良.(2017).亲密关系中的权力认知. 心理科学进展, 25(04),639-651.
[11] 王建峰, 戴冰. (2020). “追名弃利”: 权力动机与社会存在对亲社会行为的影响. 心理学报,52(1), 55-65. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020. 00055
[12] 吴漾, 温芳芳, 陈真珍, 佐斌. (2014). 权力增加还是降低观点采择? 基于本土的验证. 中国临床心理学杂志,22(6), 957-963. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.06.002
[13] 闫辰聿, 和红.(2022).回归传统还是向现代转变——年龄、时期和队列视角下中国人性别角色观念的变迁. 兰州学刊,15(05),79-91.
[14] 郑丹丹, 杨善华. (2003). 夫妻关系“定势” 与权力策略. 社会学研究,18(4), 96-105. doi:10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2003.04.010
[15] 周静, 杨莹, 周天爽, 孙兰, 崔丽娟. (2021). 权力感与亲社会倾向:自我获益的中介和情境的调节作用. 心理科学,44(2), 370-376. doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20210216
[16] Belmi, P., & Laurin, K. (2016). Who wants to get to the top? Class and lay theories about power. J Pers Soc Psychol, 111(4), 505-529. doi:10.1037/pspi0000060
[17] Chen S., Lee-Chai A. Y., & Bargh J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. J Pers Soc Psychol, 80(2), 173-187. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173
[18] Cho, M., & Keltner, D. (2020). Power, approach, and inhibition: Empirical advances of a theory.Curr Opin Psychol, 33, 196-200. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.013
[19] Dévieux J. G., Jean-Gilles M., Rosenberg R., Beck-Sagué C., Attonito J. M., Saxena A., .. Stein J. A. (2016). Depression, abuse, relationship power and condom use by pregnant and postpartum women with substance abuse history.AIDS Behav, 20(2), 292-303. doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1176-x
[20] Farrell A. K., Simpson J. A., & Rothman A. J. (2015). The relationship power inventory: Development and validation.Pers Relationship, 22(3), 387-413. doi:10.1111/pere.12072
[21] Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self-other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships.Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 39(8), 1097-1110. doi:10.1177/0146167213490031
[22] Impett E. A.,& Gordon, A. M. (2008). For the good of others: Toward a positive psychology of sacrifice. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.). Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people (pp.79-100). Westport: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
[23] Kim J. J., Visserman M. L., & Impett, E. A. (2019). Power in close intimate relationships. In C. Agnew & J. Harmon (Eds.), Power in Close Relationships. Cambridge University Press (pp. 28-54), 192-224. doi:10.1017/9781108131490.010
[24] Kocur, D., & Mandal, E. (2018). The need for power, need for influence, sense of power, and directiveness in female and male superiors and subordinates.Curr Iss Personal Ps, 6(1), 47-56. doi:10.5114/cipp.2018.72200
[25] Körner, R., & Schütz, A. (2021). Power in romantic relationships: How positional and experienced power are associated with relationship quality. J Soc Pers Relat, 38(9), 2653-2677. doi:10.1177/02654075211017670
[26] Körner, R., & Schütz, A. (2024). Power balance and relationship quality: An overstated link.Soc Psychol Pers Sci. doi:10.1177/194855 06241234391
[27] Lindová J., Průšová D., & Klapilová K. (2020). Power distribution and relationship quality in long-term heterosexual couples.J Sex Marital Ther, 46(6), 528-541. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2020.1761493
[28] Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power.Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 17(2), 158-186. doi:10.1177/10888 68312472732
[29] McCormick N. B., Brannigan G. G., & LaPlante M. N. (1984). Social desirability in the bedroom: Role of approval motivation in sexual relationships.Sex Roles, 11(3), 303-314. doi:10.1007/BF00287522
[30] Rodman, H. (1972). Marital power and the theory of resources in cultural context. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3(1), 50-69. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.3.1.50
[31] Rusbult C. E., Agnew C., & Arriaga X. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218-231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
[32] Scholl A., Sassenberg K., Scheepers D., Ellemers N., & de Wit F. (2017). A matter of focus: Power-holders feel more responsible after adopting a cognitive other-focus, rather than a self-focus. Br J Soc Psychol, 56(1), 89-102. doi:10.1111/bjso.12177
[33] Simpson J. A., Farrell A. K., Oriña M. M., & Rothman A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. A. Simpson, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 393-420). Washington: American Psychological Association.
[34] Simpson J. A., Farrell A. K., & Rothman, A. J. (2019). The dyadic power-social influence model extensions and future directions. In C. R. Agnew & J. J. Harman (Eds.), Power in close relationships (pp. 86-101). Cambridge University Press.
[35] Stephens N. M., Markus H. R., & Phillips L. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality.Annu Rev Psychol, 65, 611-634. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143
[36] Torelli, C. J., & Shavitt, S. (2011). The impact of power on information processing depends on cultural orientation.J Exp Soc Psychol, 47(5), 959-967. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.003
文章导航

/

〈 〉