目的： 探讨社会比较效应、基本心理需要满足与内卷倾向的关系。
方法：采用方便取样法,于2022年5月使用社会比较认同-对比效应量表、基本心理需要满足量表和自编的内卷倾向问卷对天津、北京两地高校的555名青年学生进行线上和线下问卷调查,并应用结构方程模型进行统计分析。
结果：上行对比、上行同化和胜任需要满足正向预测内卷倾向,下行对比负向预测内卷倾向。以四种社会比较效应为自变量、内卷倾向为因变量,三种基本心理需要满足为中介变量建立的结构方程模型（混合式）,有三条路径（上行对比→胜任需要满足→内卷倾向,上行同化→胜任需要满足→内卷倾向,下行同化→胜任需要满足→内卷倾向）的中介作用显著（β=-0.110,95%CI：-0.209~-0.050;β=0.198,95%CI：0.102~0.315;β=-0.097,95%CI：-0.190~-0.040）。
结论：社会比较效应不同程度预测内卷倾向,胜任需要满足在两者之间起着中介作用。
Objective: To explore the relationship between social comparison effect, basic psychological needs satisfaction, and involution tendency.
Methods: Using the convenience sampling method, in May 2022, a total of 555 young college students in Tianjin and Beijing were surveyed online and offline with the Identification/Contrast Social Comparison Scale, the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale, and the Involution Tendency Questionnaire. SPSS and AMOS were used to perform statistical analysis.
Results: Upward contrast, upward identification, and competence needs satisfaction positively predict the involution tendency, and downward contrast negatively predicts the involution tendency. The structural equation model (mixed type) was established with four types of social comparison effects as independent variables, involution tendency as the dependent variable, and three basic psychological needs satisfaction as the mediating variables. The mediating role is significant in three pathways (upward contrast → competence needs satisfaction → involution tendency, upward identification → competence needs satisfaction → involution tendency, downward identification → competence needs satisfaction → involution tendency)（β=-0.110, 95%CI: -0.209 to -0.050; β=0.198, 95%CI: 0.102 to 0.315; β= -0.097, 95%CI: -0.190 to -0.040）.
Conclusion: The social comparison effect predicts involution tendency to varying degrees, and competence needs satisfaction plays a mediating role between the two.
[1] 陈晶晶, 陈宇蝶. (2021). 考研大学生的向上社会比较与考研焦虑的相关性. 校园心理,19(2), 148-151. doi:10.19521/j.cnki.1673-1662.2021.02.014
[2] 洪幼娟, 林斐, 刘丽婷, 林宛儒, 连榕, 林荣茂. (2021). 受害者公正敏感性对生活满意度的影响: 上行社会比较和妒忌的中介作用. 心理发展与教育. 37(4), 592-600. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.04.16
[3] 纪志耿. (2021). 社区治理“内卷化”的特征及突破. 人民论坛, (12), 73-75. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3381.2021.12.018
[4] 金尚可, 王泗通. (2021). 大学生学习“内卷化”的困境与突破. 大众文艺, 193-194. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5828.2021.16.098
[5] 李舒欣. (2020). 社交网站中上行社会比较对妒忌的影响: 内隐自尊的调节作用. 心理月刊, 15(18), 11-13, 16. doi:10.19738/j.cnki.psy.2020.18.004
[6] 林扬千. (2021). 精疲力竭的突围: 大学生内卷化现象的表现、危害及应对. 当代青年研究, (3), 88-93. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1789.2021.03.013
[7] 刘惠军. (2012). 动机心理学. 北京: 开明出版社.
[8] 卢晓雯. (2021). 多维视角下的内卷化: 研究现状及概念梳理. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 35(6), 130-136. doi:10.19648/j.cnki.jhustss1980.2021.06.14
[9] 田仕静, 张宏溧, 于丽平, 王娜, 杜洁, 赵民, 林钧昌. (2021). 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间山东省某高校医学生社会比较倾向与错失焦虑的关系. 医学与社会, 34(9), 93-96, 101. doi:10.13723/j.yxysh.2021.09.019
[10] 吴才智, 荣硕, 朱芳婷, 谌燕, 郭永玉. (2018). 基本心理需要及其满足. 心理科学进展,26(6), 1063-1073. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01063
[11] 邢淑芬, 俞国良. (2006). 社会比较: 对比效应还是同化效应? 心理科学进展,14(6), 944-949.
[12] 杨露. (2011). 员工的社会比较及其与工作压力的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
[13] 张珊珊, 刘致宏. (2022). 社交网络上行社会比较对大学生睡眠质量的影响: 在线社交焦虑和乐观人格的作用. 中国健康心理学杂志.30(11), 1728-1733. doi:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2022.11.023
[14] 张雯, 潘超, 姚诗铭, 朱佳佳, 凌东, 杨涵淳, 徐静莎, 穆妍. (印刷中). 中国社会中“内卷”现象的个体心理内涵及其特征维度.心理学报.
[15] Blanton, H. (2001). Evaluating the self in the context of another: The three-selves model of social comparison assimilation and contrast. In G Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium and the legacy and future of social cognition (pp.75-88). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
[16] Carducci B. J., Nave C. S., MIO J. S., & RIGGIO R. E. (2020). The Wiley encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781119547143
[17] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior.Psychol Inq, 11(4), 227-268. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
[18] Fang H., Wan X., Zheng S., & Meng L. (2020). The spillover effect of autonomy frustration on human motivation and its electrophysiological representation. Front Hum Neurosci, 14, 134. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00134
[19] Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.Hum Relat, 7(2), 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
[20] Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement.Motiv Emot, 27, 199-223.
[21] Gibbons F. X., Lane D. J., Gerrard M., Reis-Bergan M., Lautrup C. L., Pexa N. A., ... Blanton H. (2002). Comparison-level preferences after performance: Is downward comparison theory still useful? J Pers Soc Psychol, 83(4), 865-880. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.865
[22] Levine S. L., Brabander C. J., Moore A. M., Holding A. C., & Koestner R. (2022). Unhappy or unsatisfied: Distinguishing the role of negative affect and need frustration in depressive symptoms over the academic year and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Motiv Emot, 46(1), 126-136. doi:10.1007/s11031-021-09920-3
[23] Ryan R. M., Ryan W. S., Di Domenico, S. I., & Deci, E. L. (2019). The nature and the conditions of human autonomy and flourishing: Self-determination theory and basic psychological needs R M Ryan (Ed) The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (pp 89-110) Oxford University Press Self-determination theory and basic psychological needs. R. M. Ryan (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (pp. 89-110). Oxford University Press.
[24] Schiffrin H. H., Erchull M. J., Sendrick E., Yost J. C., Power V., & Saldanha E. R. (2019). The effects of maternal and paternal helicopter parenting on the self-determination and well-being of emerging adults. J Child Fam Stud, 28(12), 3346-3359. doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01513-6
[25] Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2013). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Springer Science & Business Media.
[26] Van der Zee K., Buunk B., Sanderman R., Botke G., & van den Bergh, F. (2000). Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment.Pers Individ Differ, 28(1), 17-34. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00045-8
