论著

基于潜在剖面分析的大学生人格类型与内外化问题之关系

  • 王雨晨 ,
  • 肖放 ,
  • 朱莉
展开
  • 西南交通大学心理研究与咨询中心,成都 611756
王雨晨,2019年进入西南交通大学攻读应用心理学硕士学位。研究方向为心理健康教育。
*肖放, xiaofangbox@hotmail.com

网络出版日期: 2024-10-16

基金资助

四川省社会科学规划重大课题(SC19EZD029)

The Relationship Between Personality Types and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems of College Students: A Latent Profile Analysis

  • WANG Yuchen ,
  • XIAO Fang ,
  • ZHU Li
Expand
  • Psychological Research and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
*XIAO Fang, xiaofangbox@hotmail.com

Online published: 2024-10-16

摘要

目的:考察大学生人格的潜在类别,比较不同人格类型的大学生在人口学变量、内外化问题上的差异。
方法:采用大五人格量表和中国大学生心理健康筛查量表对11 636名大学生进行问卷调查,并采用潜在剖面分析对大学生人格特质进行划分。
结果:(1)大学生人格类型共分为四类:积极型(9.2%)、普通型(45.8%)、紧张型(37.5%)和退缩型(7.5%)。(2)不同人格类型大学生在人口学变量分布上存在差异。(3)退缩型个体的内外化问题最为严重,紧张型次之,积极型个体的内外化问题最少。
结论:高校应重点关注紧张型和退缩型大学生的健全人格培养,提升其心理健康水平。

本文引用格式

王雨晨 , 肖放 , 朱莉 . 基于潜在剖面分析的大学生人格类型与内外化问题之关系[J]. 心理学通讯, 2021 , 4(4) : 209 -216 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.221067

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the potential personality classes of college students and to compare the demographic characteristics and internalizing and externalizing problems of students with different personality types.
Methods: A total of 11 636 college students were enrolled to complete the Five-Factor Inventory and College Students Mental Health Screening Scale. Latent profile analysis was used to classify the personality characteristics of college students.
Results: (1) There were 4 personality types in college students: positive (9.2%), ordinary (45.8%), tension (37.5%), and withdrawal (7.5%). (2) There were differences in the distribution of demographic characteristics among college students with different personality types. (3) Individuals of the withdrawal type had the severest internalizing and externalizing problems followed by the tension type, and the positive type experienced the smallest number of internalizing and externalizing problems.
Conclusions: Colleges should put emphasis on the positive development of personality of students who had tension or withdrawal personality and enhance their mental health.

参考文献

[1] 方晓义, 袁晓娇, 胡伟, 邓林园, 蔺秀云. (2018). 中国大学生心理健康筛查量表的编制. 心理与行为研究,16(1), 111-118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.01.015
[2] 李启明, 陈志霞. (2015). 大五人格5个维度及10个面的发展水平——基于我国15~75岁横断样本调查. 心理科学,38(1), 131-138. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2015.01.015
[3] 马雷, 韩树明. (2021). 大学新生心理测评的实效性检验与提升策略. 高校辅导员学刊,13(3), 52-57. doi: 10.13585/j.cnki.gxfdyxk.2021.03.011
[4] 聂衍刚, 林崇德, 郑雪, 丁莉, 彭以松. (2008). 青少年社会适应行为与大五人格的关系. 心理科学,31(4), 774-779. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2008.04.003
[5] 司徒巧敏. (2017). 大学生问题行为及其与大五人格和自我控制的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志,25(2), 317-320. doi: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2017.02.041
[6] 易晓明, 定险峰, 薛璟, 吴欣怡. (2021). 《中国大学生心理健康筛查量表》测量结果解释的优化. 中国临床心理学杂志,29(5), 962-966. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2021.05.014
[7] 尹奎, 赵景, 周静, 聂琦. (2021). “大五”人格剖面: 以个体为中心的研究路径. 心理科学进展,29(10), 1866-1877.
[8] 俞国良, 张亚利. (2020). 大中小幼心理健康教育一体化: 人格的视角. 教育研究, 41(6), 125-133.
[9] 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展,12(6), 942-950. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2004.06.018
[10] 朱安新, 曹蕊. (2019). 当前中国家庭的亲子关系: 城乡和阶层差异模式. 贵州社会科学, (7), 75-86. doi: 10.13713/j.cnki.cssci.2019. 07.010
[11] 邹容, 谢笑春, 李晶晶, 洪晓彬, 范翠英. (2019). 中学生人格类型与生活满意度的关系. 中国学校卫生, 40(10), 1506-1508. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.10.019
[12] Achenbach T. M., Ivanova M. Y., Rescorla L. A., Turner L. V., & Althoff R. R. (2016). Internalizing/externalizing problems: Review and recommendations for clinical and research applications. JAACAP, 55(8), 647-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.012
[13] Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic.Pers Individ Differ, 13(6), 653-665. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
[14] Deyoung C., Peterson J., Séguin J., & Tremblay R. (2008). Externalizing Behavior and the Higher Order Factors of the Big Five. Journal of abnormal psychology, 117, 947-953. doi: 10.1037/a0013742
[15] Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture.Cross-Cultl Res, 38(1), 52-88. doi: 10.1177/1069397103259443
[16] Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). CA, Sage: Thousand Oaks.
[17] Isler L., Fletcher G. J. O., Liu J. H., & Sibley C. G. (2017). Validation of the four-profile configuration of personality types within the Five-Factor Model.Pers Individ Differ, 106, 257-262. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.058
[18] Kotov R., Gamez W., Schmidt F., & Watson D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis.Psychol Bull, 136(5), 768-821. doi: 10.1037/a0020327
[19] Leikas, S., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Personality types during transition to young adulthood: How are they related to life situation and well-being? J Adolesc, 37(5), 753-762. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence. 2014.01.003
[20] Min, H., & Su, S. (2020). Examining relationships between personality profiles and organizational health outcomes.Pers Individ Differ, 164, 110118. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110118
[21] Ormel J., Jeronimus B. F., Kotov R., Riese H., Bos E. H., Hankin B.,.. Oldehinkel A. J. (2013). Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship.Clin Psychol Rev, 33(5), 686-697. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.04.003
[22] Nylund K. L., Asparouhov T., & Muthén B. O. (2007). Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569.
[23] Park H. H., Wiernik B. M., Oh I. S., Gonzalez-Mulé E., Ones D. S., & Lee Y. (2020). Meta-analytic five-factor model personality intercorrelations: Eeny, meeny, miney, moe, how, which, why, and where to go.J Appl Psychol, 105(12), 1490-1529. doi: 10.1037/apl0000476
[24] Robins R. W., John O. P., Caspi A., Moffitt T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. J Pers Soc Psychol, 70(1), 157-171. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.157
[25] Schmiege S., Masyn K., & Bryan A. (2017). Confirmatory latent class analysis: Illustrations of empirically driven and theoretically driven model constraints.Organl Res Methods, 21(4), 983-1001. doi: 10.1177/1094428117747689
[26] van den Akker, A. L., Deković M., Asscher J. J., Shiner R. L., & Prinzie P. (2013). Personality types in childhood: Relations to latent trajectory classes of problem behavior and overreactive parenting across the transition into adolescence.J Pers Soc Psychol, 104(4), 750-764. doi: 10.1037/a0031184
[27] Woo S. E., Jebb A., Tay L., & Parrigon S. (2017). Putting the “person” in the center: Review and synthesis of person-centered approaches and methods in organizational science.Organl Res Methods, 21(4), 814-845. doi: 10.1177/1094428117752467
[28] Xie X., Chen W., Lei L., Xing C., & Zhang Y. (2016). The relationship between personality types and prosocial behavior and aggression in Chinese adolescents.Pers Individ Differ, 95, 56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.002
文章导航

/

〈 〉