综述

面孔工作记忆加工的影响因素及其神经机制

  • 徐晓敏 ,
  • 唐丹丹 ,
  • 陈江涛
展开
  • 1福建师范大学心理学院,福州 350117;
    2海南师范大学心理学院,海口 571158;
    3海南省青少年心理发展与教育研究基地,海口 571158;
    4周口师范学院教育科学学院,周口 466001
徐晓敏,福建师范大学在读博士研究生,海南师范大学助理研究员,主要研究方向为教育心理学、心理健康教育。

网络出版日期: 2024-11-22

基金资助

海南省青少年心理发展与教育研究基地开放课题(2301702)

Influencing Factors and Neural Mechanisms of Face Working Memory Processing

  • XU Xiaomin ,
  • TANG Dandan ,
  • CHEN Jiangtao
Expand
  • 1School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China;
    2School of Psychology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China;
    3Adolescent Psychological Development and Education Center of Hainan, Haikou 571158, China;
    4College of Educational Science, Zhoukou Normal University, Zhoukou 466001, China

Online published: 2024-11-22

摘要

近年来,面孔工作记忆的研究取得了较大进展。文章从面孔工作记忆加工的容量和精度等内容表征出发,详细阐述了熟悉度、面孔表情、注视朝向、面孔特征和储存知识等影响面孔工作记忆加工的主要因素,探讨了各种影响因素背后的神经机制。此外,文章从面孔身份信息对工作记忆内容表征的影响、负性情绪面孔工作记忆加工机制和面孔工作记忆加工的特异性三个方面提出了未来的研究方向。有助于加深对面孔工作记忆加工机制的理解,为相关研究提供了参考依据。

本文引用格式

徐晓敏 , 唐丹丹 , 陈江涛 . 面孔工作记忆加工的影响因素及其神经机制[J]. 心理学通讯, 2024 , 7(2) : 144 -150 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.224019

Abstract

In recent years, research on face working memory has made significant progress. This review introduces content representations of face working memory processing, such as capacity and precision, and elaborates on the main factors affecting face working memory processing, including familiarity, facial expressions, gaze direction, facial features, and stored knowledge. The neural mechanisms underlying face working memory processing are also discussed. Additionally, this research proposes future directions from three aspects: the impact of facial identity information on the representation of face working memory content, the processing mechanisms of negative emotional face working memory, and the specificity of face working memory processing. This review helps deepen our understanding of the mechanisms of face working memory processing and provides a reference for future studies in this area.

参考文献

[1] 冉光明, 李睿, 张琪. (2020). 高社交焦虑者识别动态情绪面孔的神经机制. 心理科学进展,28(12), 1979-1988.
[2] Adams R. B., Pauker K., & Weisbuch M. (2010). Looking the other way: The role of gaze direction in the cross-race memory effect. J Exp Soc Psychol, 46(2), 478-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.016
[3] Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects.Psychol Sci, 15(2), 106-111. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x
[4] Anzures, G., & Mildort, M. (2021). Do perceptual expertise and implicit racial bias predict early face-sensitive ERP responses? Brain Cogn, 147, 105671. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105671
[5] Axelrod, V., & Yovel, G. (2010). External facial features modify the representation of internal facial features in the fusiform face area. Neuroimage, 52(2), 720-725. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.027
[6] Brady T. F., Alvarez G. A., & Störmer V. S. (2019). The role of meaning in visual memory: Face-selective brain activity predicts memory for ambiguous face stimuli.J Neurosci, 39(6), 1100-1108. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1693-18.2018
[7] Brady T. F., Konkle T., & Alvarez G. A. (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.J Vis, 11(5), 4. doi: 10.1167/11.5.4
[8] Brady T. F., Störmer V. S., & Alvarez G. A. (2016). Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113(27), 7459-7464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520027113
[9] Brunyé T. T., Moran J. M., Holmes A., Mahoney C. R., & Taylor H. A. (2017). Non-invasive brain stimulation targeting the right fusiform gyrus selectively increases working memory for faces.Brain Cogn, 113, 32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.01.006
[10] Caudek, C. (2013). The fidelity of visual memory for faces and non-face objects.Acta Psychol, 143(1), 40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.002
[11] Cauquil A. S., Edmonds G. E., & Taylor M. J. (2000). Is the face-sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention?Neuroreport, 11(10), 2167-2171. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200007140-00021
[12] Chiou, R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). The anterior-ventrolateral temporal lobe contributes to boosting visual working memory capacity for items carrying semantic information.Neuroimage, 169, 453-461. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.085
[13] Curby, K. M., & Gauthier, I. (2007). A visual short-term memory advantage for faces.Psychon B Rev, 14(4), 620-628. doi: 10.3758/BF03196811
[14] Curby K. M., Smith S. D., Moerel D., & Dyson A. (2019). The cost of facing fear: Visual working memory is impaired for faces expressing fear.Br J Psychol, 110(2), 428-448. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12324
[15] Degutis J., Mercado R. J., Wilmer J., & Rosenblatt A. (2013). Individual differences in holistic processing predict the own-race advantage in recognition memory.PLoS One, 8(4), e58253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058253
[16] Druzgal, T. J., & D’Esposito, M. (2003). Dissecting contributions of prefrontal cortex and fusiform face area to face working memory. J Cogn Neurosci, 15(6), 771-784. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370708
[17] Duchaine, B., & Yovel, G. (2015). A revised neural framework for face processing.Annu Rev Vis Sci, 1, 393-416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035518
[18] Durston, A. J., & Itier, R. J. (2021). The early processing of fearful and happy facial expressions is independent of task demands: Support from mass univariate analyses.Brain Res, 1765, 147505. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147505
[19] Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing.Neuroreport, 13(4), 427-431. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200203250-00013
[20] Elli G. V., Lane C., Bedny M. (2019). A double dissociation in sensitivity to verb and noun semantics across cortical networks.Cereb Cortex, 29(11), 4803-4817. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz014
[21] Gambarota, F., & Sessa, P. (2019). Visual working memory for faces and facial expressions as a useful “tool” for understanding social and affective cognition. Front Psychol, 10, 2392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02392
[22] Gazzaley A., Rissman J., & D’esposito M. (2004). Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance.Cogn Affect Behav Ne, 4(4), 580-599. doi: 10.3758/CABN.4.4.580
[23] Gregory, S. E. A., Langton, S. R. H., Yoshikawa, S., & Jackson, M. C. (2020). A cross-cultural investigation into the influence of eye gaze on working memory for happy and angry faces. Cogn Emot, 34(8), 1561-1572. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1782353
[24] Hadders-Algra, M. (2022). Human face and gaze perception is highly context specific and involves bottom-up and top-down neural processing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 132, 304-323. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.042
[25] Isomura T., Ogawa S., & Masataka N. (2019, January). Local features in angry faces capture attention in children with autism spectrum disorders exhibiting local-biased perceptual characteristics. In2019 11th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST)(pp. 203-207). Phuket, Thailand: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/KST.2019.8687532
[26] Jackson M. C., Linden D. E. J., & Raymond J. E. (2014). Angry expressions strengthen the encoding and maintenance of face identity representations in visual working memory.Cogn Emot, 28(2), 278-297. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.816655
[27] Jackson, M. C., & Raymond, J. E. (2004). Visual working memory for faces. J Vis, 4(8), 394. doi: 10.1167/4.8.394
[28] Jonas, J., & Rossion, B. (2021). Intracerebral electrical stimulation to understand the neural basis of human face identity recognition.Eur J Neurosci, 54(8), 4197-4211. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15235
[29] Jones B. C., Debruine L. M., Little A. C., Conway C. A., & Feinberg D. R. (2006). Integrating gaze direction and expression in preferences for attractive faces.Psychol Sci, 17(7), 588-591. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01749.x
[30] Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception.Nat Neurosci, 3(8), 759-763. doi: 10.1038/77664
[31] Krzysztof K., Jeremi O., Katarzyna S., & Werner S. (2023). The importance of ocular artifact removal in single-trial ERP analysis: The case of the N250 in face learning.Biomed Signal Proces, 79(1), 503-513.
[32] Langeslag S. J. E., Morgan H. M., Jackson M. C., Linden D. E. J., & Van Strien, J. W. (2009). Electrophysiological correlates of improved short-term memory for emotional faces.Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 887-896. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.024
[33] Lee, S. H., & Baker, C. I. (2016). Multi-voxel decoding and the topography of maintained information during visual working memory.Front Syst Neurosci, 10, 2. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00002
[34] Lorenc E. S., Pratte M. S., Angeloni C. F., & Tong F. (2014). Expertise for upright faces improves the precision but not the capacity of visual working memory.Atten Percept Psycho, 76(7), 1975-1984. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0653-z
[35] Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature, 390, 279-281. doi:10.1038/36846
[36] Maran T., Sachse P., & Furtner M. (2015). From specificity to sensitivity: Affective states modulate visual working memory for emotional expressive faces.Front Psychol, 6, 1297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01297
[37] Meyer K., Rostami H. N., Ouyang G., Debener S., Sommer W., & Hildebrandt A. (2021). Mechanisms of face specificity: Differentiating speed and accuracy in face cognition by event-related potentials of central processing.Cortex, 134, 114-133. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.10.016
[38] Nishimura Y., Tsuda H., & Ogawa H. (2022). Own-race advantage in visual working memory for faces reflects enhanced storage capacity and quick encoding.Jpn Psychol Res, 64(4), 449-460. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12327
[39] Parkington, K. B., & Itier, R. J. (2019). From eye to face: The impact of face outline, feature number, and feature saliency on the early neural response to faces. Brain Res, 1722, 146343. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146343
[40] Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b.Clin Neurophysiol, 118(10), 2128-2148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
[41] Rhodes G., Hayward W. G., & Winkler C. (2006). Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces.Psychon B Rev, 13(3), 499-505. doi: 10.3758/BF03193876
[42] Sadeh B., Podlipsky I., Zhdanov A., & Yovel G. (2010). Event-related potential and functional MRI measures of face-selectivity are highly correlated: A simultaneous ERP-fMRI investigation.Hum Brain Mapp, 31(10), 1490-1501. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20952
[43] Schindler, S., & Bublatzky, F. (2020). Attention and emotion: An integrative review of emotional face processing as a function of attention.Cortex, 130, 362-386. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.010
[44] Schweinberger S. R., Pickering E. C., Burton A. M., & Kaufmann J. M. (2002). Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition.Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 2057-2073. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00050-7
[45] Schweinberger S. R., Pickering E. C., Jentzsch I., Burton A. M., & Kaufmann J. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions.Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 14(3), 398-409. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00142-8
[46] Scolari M., Vogel E. K., & Awh E. (2008). Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory.Psychon B Rev, 15(1), 215-222. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.215
[47] Sessa P., Luria R., Gotler A., Jolicœur P., & Dell’acqua R. (2011). Interhemispheric ERP asymmetries over inferior parietal cortex reveal differential visual working memory maintenance for fearful versus neutral facial identities.Psychophysiology, 48(2), 187-197. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01046.x
[48] Tanaka J. W., Kiefer M., & Bukach C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study.Cognition, 93(1), B1-B9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011.
[49] Taylor, M. J. (2002). Non-spatial attentional effects on P1.Clin Neurophysiol, 113(12), 1903-1908. doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00309-7
[50] Volfart A., Yan X. Q., Maillard L., Colnat-Coulbois S., Hossu G., Rossion B., .. Jonas J. (2022). Intracerebral electrical stimulation of the right anterior fusiform gyrus impairs human face identity recognition.Neuroimage, 250, 118932. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118932
[51] Vuilleumier, P., & Pourtois, G. (2007). Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging.Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 174-194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003
[52] Wang Z., Ni H., Zhou X., Yang X. T., Zheng Z., Sun Y., .. Jin H. (2023). Looking at the upper facial half enlarges the range of holistic face processing.Sci Rep, 13(1), 2419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29583-z
[53] Won B. Y., Park H. B., & Zhang W. W. (2023). Familiarity enhances mnemonic precision but impairs mnemonic accuracy in visual working memory.Psychon B Rev, 30(4), 1452-1462. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02250-0
[54] Wyble B., Swan G., & Callahan-Flintoft C. (2016). Measuring visual memory in its native format. Trends Cogn Sci, 20(11), 790-791. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.012
[55] Young S. G., Slepian M. L., Wilson J. P., & Hugenberg K. (2014). Averted eye-gaze disrupts configural face encoding. J Exp Soc Psychol, 53, 94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.002
[56] Young, A. W., & Burton, A. M. (2018). Are we face experts?Trends Cogn Sci, 22(2), 100-110. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.007
[57] Zhang, W. W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.Nature, 453, 233-235. doi: 10.1038/nature06860
[58] Zhou X. M., Mondloch C. J., & Emrich S. M. (2018). Encoding differences affect the number and precision of own-race versus other-race faces stored in visual working memory.Atten Percept Psycho, 80(3), 702-712. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1467-6
文章导航

/

〈 〉