论著

评价条件反射对面孔二态性刻板印象的可塑性作用初探——基于热情和能力两个维度

  • 孙术雪 ,
  • 陈丽君
展开
  • 福州大学人文社会科学学院,福州 350108
孙术雪,福州大学2022级心理学硕士研究生,研究方向为:人工智能与网络心理学
*陈丽君qqkx159@126.com。

网络出版日期: 2025-03-20

基金资助

福建省教育科学规划项目(FJJKBK23-06)

A Preliminary Study on the Malleability of Evaluative Conditioning in Facial Dimorphism Stereotypes: Based on Two Dimensions of Warmth and Competence

  • SUN Shuxue ,
  • CHEN Lijun
Expand
  • School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
*CHEN Lijun,qqkx159@126.com

Online published: 2025-03-20

摘要

目的: 探讨评价条件反射技术对面孔二态性刻板印象的可塑性作用。
方法: 采用方便取样的方法 ,使用刻板印象测量程序、评价条件反射技术对40名大学生被试进行实验。
结果: (1)能力维度上,被试改变了对女性化面孔的能力感知,加深了对具有女性化特征的面孔的个体与能力高相联系的认同,且不同性别被试对于不同性别的面孔二态性的刻板印象存在差异;(2)热情维度上,没有发现面孔二态性刻板印象的可塑性证据。
结论: 研究首次证明评价条件反射对基于能力维度的面孔二态性刻板印象具有一定的可塑性,尽管这种可塑性比较有限。

本文引用格式

孙术雪 , 陈丽君 . 评价条件反射对面孔二态性刻板印象的可塑性作用初探——基于热情和能力两个维度[J]. 心理学通讯, 2024 , 7(3) : 176 -184 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.224023

Abstract

Objective: To explore the malleability of evaluative conditioning on facial dimorphism stereotypes.
Methods: 40 college students were tested by stereotype measurement program and evaluative conditioning with convenient sampling.
Results: (1) In terms of competence dimension, participants altered their competence perception of feminine faces, increasing their association of feminine facial characteristics with high competence, and there were differences in the stereotype of facial dimorphism of different genders; (2) In terms of warm dimension, there was no evidence of malleability of the facial dimorphism stereotype based on the warm dimension.
Conclusion: The current study is the first to demonstrate that evaluative conditioning has some malleability on competence-based facial dimorphism stereotypes, although this malleability is relatively limited.

参考文献

[1] 程婕婷, 史梦薇. (2023). “凭感觉”的热情与能力:社会认知内容的生理线索. 心理科学进展, 31(3), 443-454.
[2] 陈丽君, 黄美林, 蒋销柳. (2024). 人际知觉中面孔二态性的人格标签效应. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 38(2), 132-140.
[3] 陈丽君, 王欣, 赵陵波, 陈昕, 王益文. (2018). 面孔二态性对学前儿童信任行为的影响:来自人格标签的解释. 心理发展与教育, 34(5), 513-522.
[4] 韩尚锋, 甘烨彤, 刘燊, 王秀娟, 杨亚平, 徐强, 张林. (2019). 面孔加工中的热情优先效应:来自眼动的证据. 心理科学, 42(4), 770-776.
[5] 王祯. (2021). 儿童的性别刻板印象威胁及其干预. 心理科学进展, 29(2), 276-285.
[6] 杨亚平, 徐强, 朱婷婷, 郑旭涛, 董晓晔, 陈庆伟. (2019). 不同热情-能力社会群体刻板印象激活效应的行为模式:基于刻板印象内容模型. 心理学报, 51(10), 1143-1156.
[7] 张振, 齐春辉, 王洋, 赵辉, 王小新, 高晓雷. (2020). 内群体偏爱或黑羊效应?经济博弈中公平规范执行的群体偏见. 心理科学进展, 28(2), 329-339.
[8] Balliet D., Wu J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull, 140(6), 1556-1581. doi:10.1037/a0037737
[9] Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 6(3), 242-261. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR 0603_8
[10] Burns M. D., Monteith M. J., & Parker L. R. (2017). Training away bias: The differential effects of counterstereotype training and self-regulation on stereotype activation and application. J Exp Soc Psychol, 73, 97-110. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.003
[11] Chua, K., & Freeman, J. B. (2022). Learning to judge a book by its cover: Rapid acquisition of facial stereotypes. J Exp Soc Psychol, 98, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104225
[12] Eagly, A. H., & Sczesny, S. (2019). Editorial: Gender roles in the future? Theoretical foundations and future research directions. Front Psychol, 10, 1-6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01965
[13] Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 27(2), 67-73. doi:10.1177/0963721417738825
[14] Inagaki, T. K., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2013). Shared neural mechanisms underlying social warmth and physical warmth. Psychol Sci, 24(11), 2272-2280. doi:10.1177/0956797613492773
[15] Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 18, 1-12. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17
[16] Kawakami K., Amodio D. M., & Hugenberg K. (2017). Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. Adv Exp Soc Psychol, 55, 1-80. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.001
[17] Kawakami K., Dovidio J. F., & van Kamp S. (2005). Kicking the habit: Effects of nonstereotypic association training and correction processes on hiring decisions. J Exp Soc Psychol, 41(1), 68-75. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.004
[18] Luo X., Song J., Guan J., Wang X., & Chen L. (2024). Influence of facial dimorphism on interpersonal trust: Weighing warmth and competence traits in different trust situations. Curr Psychol, 43(3), 2158-2172. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04472-w
[19] Melson-Silimon A., Spivey B. N., & Skinner-Dorkenoo A. L. (2024). The construction of racial stereotypes and how they serve as racial propaganda. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 18(1), 1-20. doi:10.1111/spc3.12862
[20] Moran T., Dror T., & Bar-Anan Y. (2020). Testing the judgment-related account for the extinction of evaluative conditioning. Cogn Emot, 34(8), 1690-1703. doi:10.1080/02699931.2020.1798878
[21] Moran T., Nudler Y., & Bar-Anan Y. (2023). Evaluative conditioning: Past, present, and future. Annu Rev Psychol, 74(1), 245-269. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031815
[22] Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 32(4), 421-433. doi:10.1177/0146167205284004
[23] Perrett D. I., Lee K. J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D. M., … Akamatsu S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nat, 394(6696), 884-887. doi:10.1038/29772
[24] Phills C. E., Kawakami K., Krusemark D. R., & Nguyen J. (2019). Does reducing implicit prejudice increase out-group identification? The downstream consequences of evaluative training on associations between the self and racial categories. Soc Psychol Personal Sci, 10(1), 26-34. doi:10.1177/1948550617732817
[25] Pireddu S., Bongiorno R., Ryan M. K., Rubini M., & Menegatti M. (2022). The deficit bias: Candidate gender differences in the relative importance of facial stereotypic qualities to leadership hiring. Br J Soc Psychol, 61(2), 644-671. doi:10.1111/bjso.12501
[26] Rhodes G., Hickford C., & Jeffery L. (2000). Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? Br J Psychol, 91(1), 125-140. doi:10.1348/000712600 161718
[27] Salvia E., Mevel K., Borst G., Poirel N., Simon G., Orliac F., … De Neys W. (2020). Age-related neural correlates of facial trustworthiness detection during economic interaction. J Neurosci Psychol Econ, 13(1), 19-33. doi:10.1037/npe0000112
[28] Sutherland C., Rhodes G., & Young A. W. (2017). Facial image manipulation: A tool for investigating social perception. Soc Psychol Personal Sci, 8(5), 538-551. doi:10.1177/1948550617697176
[29] Todorov, A., & Oh, D. (2021). The structure and perceptual basis of social judgments from faces. Adv Exp Soc Psychol, 63, 189-245. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.11.004
[30] Wen F., Zuo B., Ma S., Xu Y., Coley J. D., & Wang Y. (2020). Do we see masculine faces as competent and feminine faces as warm? Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial perception. Evol Psychol, 18(4), 1-11. doi:10.1177/1474704920980642
[31] Wetzler E. L., Korenman L. M., & Rylander S. R. (2024). Gender bias in perceptions of military leaders: Hostile sexism moderates men’s evaluations of faces. Sex Roles, 90(4), 552-564. doi:10.1007/s11199-024-01462-5
文章导航

/

〈 〉