目的: 翻译Geller等编制的惊奇能力量表（Capacity for Wonder Scale,CfW）,并在中国大学生中进行信度效度和跨性别等值检验。
方法: 通过方便抽样,对815名大学生施测。对中文版CfW进行项目分析、信度分析和跨性别等值性测验,选取同理心量表（Empathy Scale）和人际好奇量表（Interpersonal Curiosity Questionnaire,ICQ）作为效标。
结果: （1）中文版CfW的12个项目区分度良好,各项目与总分的相关系数为0.560~0.674;（2）验证性因素分析显示,两因子结构模型拟合良好（RMSEA=0.074,CFI=0.896,TLI=0.871,SRMR=0.056）（3）中文版CfW信度较好,Cronbach’s α系数为0.832,四周后的重测信度为0.789;（4）惊奇能力与同理心、人际好奇均呈显著正相关。
结论: 中文版CfW具有良好的信度和效度,可作为我国大学生惊奇能力的测量工具。
Objective: To translate the Capacity for Wonder Scale (CfW) developed by Geller et al., and to test its reliability, validity, and gender invariance among Chinese college students.
Methods: Using convenience sampling, 815 college students were surveyed. Item analysis, reliability analysis, and tests for gender invariance were conducted on the Chinese version of the CfW. The Empathy Scale and the Interpersonal Curiosity Questionnaire (ICQ) were used as validity indicators.
Results: (1) The twelve items of the Chinese version of the CfW had good discriminant validity, with item-total correlations ranging from 0.560 to 0.674. (2) The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model had a good fit (RMSEA=0.074, CFI=0.896, TLI=0.871, SRMR=0.056). (3) The Chinese version of the CfW had good reliability, with a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.832 and a test-retest reliability of 0.789 after four weeks. (4) The capacity for wonder was significantly positively correlated with empathy and interpersonal curiosity.
Conclusion: The Chinese version of the CfW has good reliability and validity, and it can be used as a tool to measure the capacity for wonder among Chinese college students.
[1] 黄骐, 陈春萍, 罗跃嘉, 伍海燕. (2021). 好奇心的机制及作用. 心理科学进展, (04), 723-736. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021. 00723
[2] 姜玥, 刘明慧, 王佳宁. (2024). 人际好奇量表测评青少年的效度和信度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 38(4), 344-349.
[3] 刘靠山. (2021). 试析中西思维方式差异的本体论渊源. 商业文化, (9), 22-24.
[4] 王湃, 杨伊生, 张亚利, Nartova-Bochaver, S., Yerofeyeva, V. (2024). 发展危机问卷的中文版修订及信效度检验. 应用心理学, 1-13.
[5] Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
[6] Descartes, R. (1989). Passions of the soul. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
[7] Dietz, J., & Kleinlogel, E. P. (2014). Wage cuts and managers’ empathy: How a positive emotion can contribute to positive organizational ethics in difficult times. J Bus Ethics, 119(4), 461-472. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1836-6
[8] Egan K., Cant A., & Judson G. (2014). Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum. London: Routledge.
[9] Ellsworth P. C.,& Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[10] Evans, H. M. (2012). Wonder and the clinical encounter. Theor Med Bioeth, 33(2), 123-136. doi: 10.1007/s11017-012-9214-4
[11] Geller G., Caldwell M., & Merritt M. W. (2018). The cultivation of wonder in the premedical learning environment: Nurturing ethical character in the early formation of health professionals. J Coll Charact, 19(3), 229-235. doi: 10.1080/2194587X.2018.1481100
[12] Geller, G., Steinman, C., Caldwell, M., Goldberg, H., Hanlon, C., & Wonnell, T., et al. (2020). Development and validation of a capacity for wonder scale for use in educational settings. J Psychoeduc Assess, 38(8), 982-994. doi: 10.1177/0734282920918727
[13] Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2014). Reclaiming the value of wonder in science education. London: Routledge.
[14] Heschel A. J.(1951). Man is not alone. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux Publishing.
[15] Lazarus R. S.(1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
[16] L’Ecuyer, C. (2014). The wonder approach to learning. Front Hum Neurosci, 8, 764. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00764
[17] Litman, J. A., & Pezzo, M. V. (2007). Dimensionality of interpersonal curiosity. Pers Indiv Differ, 43(6), 1448-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.paid. 2007.04.021
[18] Paolantonio, M. (2019). Wonder, guarding against thoughtlessness in education. Stud Philos Educ, 38(3), 213-228. doi: 10.1007/s11217-018-9626-3
[19] Schinkel, A. (2017). The educational importance of deep wonder. J Philos Educ, 51(2), 538-553. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12233
[20] Schinkel, A. (2019). Education as mediation between child and world: The role of wonder. Stud Philos Educ, 39(5), 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11217-019-09687-8
[21] Shiota M. N., Keltner D., & Mossman A. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cogn Emot, 21(5), 944-963. doi: 10.1080/02699930600923668
[22] Spencer, J. (2004). Decline in empathy in medical education: How can we stop the rot?. Med Educ, 38(9), 916-918. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01965.x
[23] Tian, Q., & Robertson, J. L. (2019). How and when does perceived CSR affect employees’ engagement in voluntary pro-environmental behavior? J Bus Ethics, 155, 399-412. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3497-3
