论著

在线风险暴露与初中生心理健康:独特效应与差别效应

  • 靳康悦 ,
  • 张亚利
展开
  • 河北师范大学教育学院,石家庄 050024
靳康悦,河北师范大学硕士研究生,研究方向为数字媒体与心理健康。
*张亚利,3334205235@qq.com

网络出版日期: 2025-08-08

基金资助

河北省社会科学基金项目(HB24JY023)

Online Risk Exposure and Mental Health Among Junior High School Students: Unique and Differential Effects

  • JIN Kangyue ,
  • ZHANG Yali
Expand
  • College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
*ZHANG Yali, 33340205235@qq.com

Online published: 2025-08-08

摘要

目的: 探索不同在线风险暴露类型预测初中生心理健康的独特效应与差别效应。
方法: 采用网络风险暴露量表、焦虑量表、抑郁量表、自尊量表和主观幸福感量表调查了1 178名初中生。运用Mplus 8.3软件检验在线风险暴露不同亚型(在线受欺负、在线性引诱、个人信息泄露、不良内容接触)与初中生心理健康(焦虑、抑郁、自尊、主观幸福感)的独特与差别效应。
结果: 在线受欺负和接触不良内容对初中生焦虑、自尊、主观幸福感均具有独特效应(p<0.001),在线性引诱和个人信息泄露对抑郁和焦虑具有独特效应(p<0.001);在线风险暴露各亚型(在线受欺负、个人信息泄露、在线性引诱、不良内容接触)均与焦虑、抑郁、自尊、主观幸福感存在差别效应(p<0.001),表现为在线风险暴露对抑郁、焦虑的预测效应显著强于其对自尊和主观幸福感的预测。
结论: 与个人信息泄露和在线性引诱相比,在线受欺负和不良内容接触对个体心理健康的影响更大。在线风险暴露对抑郁的预测力最强,对自尊的预测力最弱。

本文引用格式

靳康悦 , 张亚利 . 在线风险暴露与初中生心理健康:独特效应与差别效应[J]. 心理学通讯, 2025 , 8(1) : 16 -22 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.225004

Abstract

Objective: To explore whether different types of online risk exposure have unique and differential effects on the mental health of junior high school students.
Methods: A sample of 1 178 junior high school students completed the Online Risk Exposure Scale, Anxiety Scale, Depression Scale, Self-esteem Scale, and Subjective Well-being Scale. Mplus 8.3 software was used to examine the unique and differential effects of different subtypes of online risk exposure (online harassment, online sexual solicitation, personal information breaches, exposure to explicit content) on mental health indicators (anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and subjective well-being).
Results: The results revealed that online harassment and exposure to explicit content played a unique role on middle school students' anxiety, self-esteem, and subjective well-being (p<0.001). Personal information breaches and online sexual solicitations had unique effects on depression and anxiety (p<0.001). All subtypes of online risk (online harassment, personal information breaches, online sexual solicitations, and exposure to explicit content) exposure demonstrated differential effects on anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and subjective well-being (p<0.001), with stronger predictive effects on depression and anxiety than on self-esteem and subjective well-being.
Conclusion: There are unique and differential effects of some online risk exposure subtypes on the mental health of junior high school students.

参考文献

[1] 卜若晗, 张亚利. (2025). 高中生在线风险暴露的潜在类别及其影响因素.心理技术与应用, 13(3), 147-156. doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2025.03.002
[2] 贾倩楠, 黄垣成, 马婧, 李彩娜. (2024). 父母心理控制与青少年内外化问题的纵向关联:悲伤与愤怒反刍的中介. 心理科学, 47(1), 70-79. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240109
[3] 黄顺森, 来枭雄, 张彩, 赵心媚, 代欣然, 祁梦迪, 王耘. (2024). 青少年手机压力与心理健康的关系:基于多元宇宙样分析和密集追踪方法. 心理学报, 56(6), 745-759. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00745
[4] 汤丹丹, 温忠麟. (2020). 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 43(1), 215-223. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200130
[5] 王阳, 温忠麟, 李伟, 方杰. (2022). 新世纪20年国内结构方程模型方法研究与模型发展. 心理科学进展, 30(8), 1715-1733. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01715
[6] 张亚利, 靳娟娟, 俞国良. (2022). 2010—2020 中国内地初中生心理健康问题检出率的元分析. 心理科学进展, 30(5), 965-977. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00965
[7] 张亚利, 靳康悦, 安莉娟, 张亚静. (2024). 网络风险暴露量表在中国青少年中的初步应用.中国临床心理学杂志, 32(6), 1383-1387. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2024.06.035
[8] 中华人民共和国国务院. (2023). 《未成年人网络保护条例》.2023-10-16取自 https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/202310/content_6911288
[9] Bae, S. M. (2019). The relationship between smartphone use for communication, social capital, and subjective well-being in Korean adolescents: Verification using multiple latent growth modeling.Child Youth Serv Rev, 96, 93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.032
[10] Brown, T. A., & Rosellini, A. J. (2011). The direct and interactive effects of neuroticism and life stress on the severity and longitudinal course of depressive symptoms.J Abnorm Psychol, 120(4), 844. doi: 10.1037/a0023035
[11] Chang C. W., Yuan R., & Chen J. K. (2018). Social support and depression among Chinese adolescents: The mediating roles of self-esteem and self-efficacy.Child Youth Serv Rev, 88, 128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.001
[12] Cingel D. P., Carter M. C., & Krause H. V. (2022). Social media and self-esteem.Curr Opin Psychol, 45, 101304. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101304
[13] de Dios Benítez-Sillero J., Falla D., Córdoba-Alcaide F., & Zych I. (2024). Bullying, cyberbullying, and empathy as longitudinal predictors of self-esteem.Psychol Soc Educ, 16(3), 63-71. doi: 10.21071/pse.v16i3.16243
[14] Deng C., Li D., Li Y., Liu Y., Zhang J., Huang P., & Zhai B. (2024). Reciprocal reationships among parental psychological control, emotion regulation ability, and subjective well-being of adolescents: Disentangling between-and within-person effects.J Affect Disord, 361, 546-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.088
[15] Hanson J. L., Nacewicz B. M., Sutterer M. J., Cayo A. A., Schaefer S. M., Rudolph K. D., & Davidson R. J. (2015). Behavioral problems after early life stress: Contributions of the hippocampus and amygdala.Biol Psychiatry, 77(4), 314-323. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.020
[16] Jiang, C., & Shi, J. (2024). The relationship between bullying victimization and problematic behaviors: A focus on the intrapersonal emotional competence and interpersonal social competence.Child Abuse Negl, 152, 106800. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106800
[17] Li W., Zhao Z., Chen D., Peng Y., & Lu Z. (2022). Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety symptoms among college students: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Child Psychol Psyc, 63(11), 1222-1230. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13606
[18] Martínez M., Damme K. S., Vargas T., Yang B., Rompilla D. J., Stephens J., & Haase C. M. (2024). Longitudinal study of peer victimization, social support, and mental health during early adolescence.Psychol Med, 54(9), 1940-1955. doi: 10.1017/s0033291724000035
[19] McMahon S. D., Grant K. E., Compas B. E., Thurm A. E., & Ey S. (2003). Stress and psychopathology in children and adolescents: Is there evidence of specificity? J Child Psychol Psyc, 44(1), 107-133. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00105
[20] Peluchette J. V., Karl K., Wood C., & Williams J. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization: Do victims'personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem?Comput Human Behav, 52, 424-435. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.028
[21] Plackett R., Blyth A., & Schartau P. (2023). The impact of social media use interventions on mental well-being: Systematic review. J Med Internet Res, 25, e44922. doi: 10.2196/44922
[22] Shorey S., Ng E. D., & Wong C. H. (2022). Global prevalence of depression and elevated depressive symptoms among adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Clin Psychol, 61(2), 287-305. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12333
[23] Walsh K., Mathews B., Parvin K., Smith R., Burton M., Nicholas M., & Tran N. (2025). Prevalence and characteristics of online child sexual victimization: Findings from the Australian Child Maltreatment Study.Child Abuse Negl, 160, 107186. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107186
[24] Wisniewski P., Jia H., Wang N., Zheng S., Xu H., Rosson M. B., & Carroll J. M. (2015, April). Resilience mitigates the negative effects of adolescent internet addiction and online risk exposure. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, South Korea). doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702240
[25] Zhang Y., Jin K., Huang Y., & Jiang Y. (2024). Online risk exposure and mental health in Chinese junior high school students: A latent profile analysis. J Psychol Afr, 34(6), 1-7. doi: 10.1080/14330237.2024.2425274
[26] Zhang, H., & Li, D. (2022). Stressful life events and problematic internet use in adolescence: Mediation of psychological capital and moderation of school level. J Adolescence, 94(5), 718-727. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.031
[27] Zhou L., Lv X., Zhou Y., Li J., Yu Z., & Gao X. (2024). A network analysis perspective on the relationship between boredom, attention control, and problematic short video use among a sample of Chinese young adults.Int J Ment Health Addict, 1-21. doi: 10.1007/s11469-024-01392-z
文章导航

/

〈 〉