论著

关系相关情绪分享促进人际效应的对照研究

  • 王曼 ,
  • 黄敏儿
展开
  • 1广东省精神卫生中心,南方医科大学附属广东省人民医院( 广东省医学科学院 ),广州 510120;
    2中山大学心理学系,广州 510275
王曼,中山大学2014级心理学博士,广东省精神卫生中心心理治疗师,主要研究方向为人际情绪调节。
*黄敏儿,edshme@mail.sysu.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2025-08-08

基金资助

教育部人文社会科学基金(17YJA190008)

The Beneficial Effect of Social Sharing of Relational Emotions on Interpersonal Relationships

  • WANG Man ,
  • HUANG Miner
Expand
  • 1Guangdong Mental Health Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;
    2Department of Psychology, Sun Yet-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
*HUANG Miner, edshme@mail.sysu.edu.cn

Online published: 2025-08-08

摘要

目的: 探索人际互动中关系相关情绪分享对人际效应提升的影响。
方法: 采用2(关系相关情绪分享:有/无)×2(性别:男/女)的被试间设计。招募63名被试进行双人互动任务,互动对象为同性别的实验者同盟。将被试随机分配到实验组(n=32)或控制组(n=31)。2组被试均与“同伴”(由实验者同盟扮演)分享个人一年内的积极情绪事件,相比控制组,实验组增加关系相关积极情绪的分享。对话结束后,被试报告对话情绪(积极/消极)、对话评价、互动同伴评价(人际距离、人际喜欢、共鸣感)等。
结果: 与控制组相比,实验组对对话评价更高(F=11.542,p=0.001,η2p =0.159),体验到更多的积极情绪(F=5.340,p=0.024,η2p =0.080),而在消极情绪、人际距离、人际喜欢方面,两组差异无统计学意义。此外,与控制组女性相比,实验组的女性对同伴有更多的共鸣感,F(1, 59)=9.263,p=0.003;; 而实验组和控制组的男性在共鸣感方面的差异无统计学意义,F(1, 59)=0.319,p=0.574。
结论: 在关系建立阶段,关系相关的积极情绪分享能促进个体对人际互动的积极情感体验和提高对互动的评价。关系相关情绪分享可能对促进人际效应有着独特的作用。

本文引用格式

王曼 , 黄敏儿 . 关系相关情绪分享促进人际效应的对照研究[J]. 心理学通讯, 2025 , 8(1) : 30 -37 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.225006

Abstract

Objective: To explore how social sharing of relational emotions affects interpersonal relationships.
Methods: A between-subjects design of 2 (social sharing of relational emotions: present vs absent) × 2 (gender: male vs female) was adopted. Sixty-three participants were recruited to engage in a dyadic interaction task, with a same-gender experimental confederate. All the participants were randomly assigned to experimental group (n=32) and control group (n=31).All participants shared their positive emotional events over the past year with a ‘companion' (played by an experimental confederate), with the experimental group additionally sharing relationship-related positive emotions. After the conversation, participants reported their emotions (positive/negative), conversation evaluation, and interaction evaluation (including interpersonal distance, interpersonal liking, and sense of resonance).
Results: Compared to the control group, the experimental group had a higher evaluation of the conversation (F = 11.542, p = 0.001, η2p = 0.159), experienced more positive emotions (F = 5.340, p = 0.024, η2p = 0.080), while no significant group differences were found for negative emotions, interpersonal distance or interpersonal liking. Additionally, female participants in the experimental group felt significantly more in tune with their partner than those in the control group, (F(1, 59) = 9.263, p = 0.003), while no significant difference was observed among male participants (F(1, 59)= 0.319, p = 0.574).
Conclusion: During relationship development stage, sharing positive relational emotions can promote positive affect and interpersonal evaluations. Social sharing of relational emotion may have a unique beneficial role in building interpersonal interactions.

参考文献

[1] 王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥. (2010). 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制I:理论框架与信度分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(5), 545-548.
[2] 杨柳, 黄敏儿. (2022). 情绪分享和感知恋人回应对亲密关系满意度的影响. 心理科学, 45(1), 126-132. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20220118.
[3] Algoe S. B., Fredrickson B. L., & Gable S. L. (2013). The social functions of the emotion of gratitude via expression.Emotion, 13(4), 605-609. doi: 10.1037/a0032701
[4] Arewasikporn A., Sturgeon J. A., & Zautra A. J. (2019). Sharing positive experiences boosts resilient thinking: Everyday benefits of social connection and positive emotion in a community sample.Am J Community Psychol, 63(1-2), 110-121. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12279
[5] Arican-Dinc, B., & Gable, S. L. (2023). Responsiveness in romantic partners' interactions.Curr Opin Psychol, 53, 101652. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101652
[6] Barasch, Alixandra. (2020). The consequences of sharing.Curr Opin Psychol, 31, 61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.027
[7] Boggiss A. L., Consedine N. S., Brenton-Peters J. M., Hofman P. L., & Serlachius A. S. (2020). A systematic review of gratitude interventions: Effects on physical health and health behaviors. J Psychosom Res, 135, 110165. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110165
[8] Brudner E. G., Fareri D. S., Shehata S. G., & Delgado M. R. (2022). Social feedback promotes positive social sharing, trust, and closeness. Emotion, 23(6), 1536-1548. doi: 10.1037/emo0001182
[9] Butler E. A., Egloff B., Wilhelm F. H., Smith N. C., Erickson E. A., & Gross J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3(1), 48-67. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.48
[10] Cunha L. F., Pellanda L. C., & Reppold C. T. (2019). Positive psychology and gratitude interventions: A randomized clinical trial.Front Psychol, 10, 584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00584
[11] Delgado M. R., Fareri D. S., & Chang L. J. (2023). Characterizing the mechanisms of social connection. Neuron, 111(24), 3911-3925. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.012
[12] Fritz M. M., Armenta C. N., Walsh L. C., & Lyubomirsky S. (2019). Gratitude facilitates healthy eating behavior in adolescents and young adults.J Exp Soc Psychol, 81, 4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.011
[13] Gable S. L., Reis H. T., Impett E. A., & Asher E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. J Pers Soc Psychol, 87(2), 228-245. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
[14] Gallrein A. B., Bollichziegler K. L., & Leising D. (2019). Interpersonal feedback in everyday life: Empirical studies in Germany and the United States.Eur J Soc Psychol, 49(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2381
[15] Gray A. M., Growney C. M., & English T. (2024). Perceived responses, capitalization, and daily gratitude: Do age and closeness matter?Emotion, 24(3), 867-877. doi: 10.1037/emo0001301
[16] Hill C. E., Gelso C. J., Chui H., Spangler P. T., Hummel A., Huang T., ... Bhatia A. (2014). To be or not to be immediate with clients: The use and perceived effects of immediacy in psychodynamic/interpersonal psychotherapy.Psychother Res, 24(3), 299-315. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.812262
[17] Kumar, A. (2022). Some things aren't better left unsaid: Interpersonal barriers to gratitude expression and prosocial engagement.Curr Opin Psychol, 43, 156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.011
[18] Le Y., Fredman S. J., Marshall A. D., Chow S. M., & Feinberg. (2022). Relational impacts of capitalization in early parenthood.J Fam Psychol, 36(1), 69-79. doi: 10.1037/fam0000847
[19] Newman D. B., Gordon A. M., & Mendes W. B. (2021). Comparing daily physiological and psychological benefits of gratitude and optimism using a digital platform.Emotion, 21(7), 1357-1365. doi: 10.1037/emo0001025
[20] Nils, F., & Rimé, B. (2012). Beyond the myth of venting: Social sharing modes determine the benefits of emotional disclosure.Eur J Soc Psychol, 42(6), 672-681. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1880
[21] Pagani A. F., Parise M., Donato S., Gable S. L., & Schoebi D. (2020). If you shared my happiness, you are part of me: Capitalization and the experience of couple identity.Pers Soc Psychol B, 46(2), 258-269. doi: 10.1177/0146167219854449
[22] Peters B. J., Reis H. T., & Gable S. L. (2018). Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization.Soc Pers Psychol Compass, 12(7), e12407. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12407
[23] Rime, B. (2016). Self-disclosure. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health (Vol. 4, pp. 66-74). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
[24] Rime B., Bouchat P., Paquot L., & Giglio L. (2020). Intrapersonal, interpersonal and social outcomes of the social sharing of emotion.Curr Opin Psychol, 31, 127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.024
[25] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Self Esteem and the Adolescent. (Economics and the Social Sciences: Society and the Adolescent Self-Image).New Engl Q, 148(2), 177-196.
[26] Salovey P., Mayer J. D., Goldman S. L., Turvey C., & Palfai T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion Disclosure & Health (pp. 125-154). Washington, D.C., US: Psychological Assn
[27] Schwartz E. K., Le T. P., & Cohen A. S. (2022). Sharing positive events: Ecological momentary assessment of emotion regulation via social capitalization in schizotypy.Psychiat Res, 308, 114377. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114377
[28] Shrout M. R., Black A. E., Wilson S. J., Renna M. E., Madison A. D., Kiecolt-Glaser J. K., & Reis H. T. (2023). How aging couples' emotional and physiological associations change across positive, supportive, and conflictual discussions: Roles of capitalization and responsive behaviors.Biol Psychol, 177, 108500. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108500
[29] Van Osch Y., Zeelenberg M., Breugelmans S. M., & Brandt M. J. (2019). Show or hide pride? Selective inhibition of pride expressions as a function of relevance of achievement domain.Emotion, 19(2), 334-347. doi: 10.1037/emo0000437
[30] Watkins, T. (2019). Workplace capitalization: The consequences of sharing good news at work.Acad Manag Proc, 2019(1), 10567. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2019.10567abstract
[31] Williams, L. A., & Bartlett, M. Y. (2015). Warm thanks: Gratitude expression facilitates social affiliation in new relationships via perceived warmth.Emotion, 15(1), 1-5. doi: 10.1037/emo0000017
[32] Zech, E., & Rime, B. (2005). Is talking about an emotional experience helpful? Effects on emotional recovery and perceived benefits.Clin Psychol Psychother, 12(4), 270-287. doi: 10.1002/cpp.460
[33] Zumeta L. N., Castro-Abril P., Méndez L., Pizarro J. J., Włodarczyk A., Basabe N., ... Pinto , I. R. (2020). Collective effervescence, self-transcendence, and gender differences in social well-being during 8 March demonstrations. Front Psychol, 607538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607538
文章导航

/

〈 〉