[1] 潘阳. (2020). 大学生偶然相似性对亲社会行为的影响 (硕士学位论文), 上海师范大学. doi:10.27312/d.cnki.gshsu.2020.002165.
[2] 齐芳珠, 周月月, 李巧灵, 王明辉. (2022). 经历相似性与经历性质对合作行为的影响. 心理研究,15(4), 357-364. doi: 10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2022.04.010
[3] 唐辉, 李鑫宇, 魏一帆, 李晓彩, 陈柳燕, 张曜. (2022). 伙伴选择对合作行为的影响作用与机制. 心理科学进展,30(10), 2356-2371. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02356
[4] 吴琴, 崔丽莹. (2020). 合作行为中的“眼睛效应”: 解释机制与限制因素. 心理科学进展,28(6), 994-1003. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00994
[5] Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”.Evol Hum Behav, 25(4), 209-220. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.002
[6] Barclay, P. (2013). Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans.Evol Hum Behav, 34(3), 164-175. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.02.002
[7] Barclay, P. (2015). Reputation. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 810-828). Oxford University Press.
[8] Barclay, P. (2016). Biological markets and the effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship. Curr Opin Psychol, 7, 33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.012
[9] Barclay, P., & Raihani, N. (2016). Partner choice versus punishment in human Prisoner’s Dilemmas.Evol Hum Behav, 37(4), 263-271. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.12.004
[10] Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans.P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci, 274(1610), 749-753. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0209
[11] Bear, A., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation.P Natl Acad Sci USA, 113(4), 936-941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517780113
[12] Bird, R. B., & Power, E. A. (2015). Prosocial signaling and cooperation among Martu hunters. Evol Hum Behav, 36(5), 389-397. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.02.003
[13] Bonnefon, J. F., Hopfensitz, A., & De Neys, W. (2017). Can we detect cooperators by looking at their face? Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 26(3), 276-281. doi: 10.1177/0963721417693352
[14] Coricelli, G., Fehr, D., & Fellner, G. (2004). Partner selection in public goods experiments. J Conflict Resolut, 48(3), 356-378. doi: 10.1177/0022002704264143
[15] de Melo C. M., Carnevale P. J., Read S. J., & Gratch J. (2014). Reading people’s minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol, 106(1), 73-88. doi: 10.1037/a0034251
[16] Dhaliwal, N. A., Martin, J. W., Barclay, P., & Young, L. L. (2022). Signaling benefits of partner choice decisions. J Exp Psychol Gen, 151(6), 1446-1472. doi: 10.1037/xge0001137
[17] Dufwenberg, M., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2004). A theory of sequential reciprocity.Game Econ Behav, 47(2), 268-298. doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003
[18] Eisenbruch A. B., Grillot R. L., Maestripieri D., & Roney J. R. (2016). Evidence of partner choice heuristics in a one-shot bargaining game.Evol Hum Behav, 37(6), 429-439. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.002
[19] Engel C., Kube S., & Kurschilgen M. (2021). Managing expectations: How selective information affects cooperation and punishment in social dilemma games. J Econ Behav Organ, 187(2), 111-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.029
[20] Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity.Game Econ Behav, 54(2), 293-315. doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
[21] Fehl K., van der Post, D. J., & Semmann D. (2011). Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation.Ecol Lett, 14(6), 546-551. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01615.x
[22] Fehrler, S., & Przepiorka, W. (2013). Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness: Disentangling the signaling benefits of altruistic acts.Evol Hum Behav, 34(2), 139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.005
[23] Fehrler, S., & Przepiorka, W. (2016). Choosing a partner for social exchange: Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness. J Econ Behav Organ, 129, 157-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.06.006
[24] Feinberg M., Willer R., Stellar J., & Keltner D. (2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior.J Pers Soc Psychol, 102(5), 1015-1030. doi: 10.1037/a0026650
[25] Grueneisen S., Török G., Wathiyage Don A., & Ruggeri A. (2023). Young children’s adaptive partner choice in cooperation and competition contexts.Child Dev. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14036
[26] Hardy, C. L., & van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis.Pers Soc Psychol B, 32(10), 1402-1413. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291006
[27] Harrell A., Melamed D., & Simpson B. (2018). The strength of dynamic ties: The ability to alter some ties promotes cooperation in those that cannot be altered. Sci Adv, 4(12), eaau9109. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau9109
[28] Hume, D. (1896). A treatise of human nature. Clarendon Press..
[29] Jordan J. J., Hoffman M., Nowak M. A., & Rand D. G. (2016). Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness.P Natl Acad Sci USA, 113(31), 8658-8663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601280113
[30] Lin-Healy, F., & Small, D. A. (2013). Nice guys finish last and guys in last are nice.Soc Psychol Pers Sci, 4(6), 692-698. doi: 10.1177/1948550613476308
[31] Martin, J. W., & Cushman, F. (2015). To punish or to leave: Distinct cognitive processes underlie partner control and partner choice behaviors.PLoS One, 10(4), e0125193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125193
[32] Martin J. W., Leddy K., Young L., & McAuliffe K. (2022). An earlier role for intent in children’s partner choice versus punishment.J Exp Psychol Gen, 151(3), 597-612. doi: 10.1037/xge0001093
[33] Melamed D., Harrell A., & Simpson B. (2018). Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks.P Natl Acad Sci USA, 115(5), 951-956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715357115
[34] Milinski M., Semmann D., & Krambeck H. J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’.Nature, 415, 424-426. doi: 10.1038/415424a
[35] Offer, S., & Fischer, C. S. (2018). Difficult people: Who is perceived to be demanding in personal networks and why are they there?Am Sociol Rev, 83(1), 111-142. doi: 10.1177/0003122417737951
[36] Ouyang H., Sun F. F., Che L. P., Zhang W. D., Cheng X. M., & Zheng L. (2020). The cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying norm-enforcement behaviors under social observation.Exp Brain Res, 238(5), 1311-1321. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05762-6
[37] Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2008). Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game.Evol Hum Behav, 29(3), 172-178. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.002
[38] Rand D. G., Arbesman S., & Christakis N. A. (2011). Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.P Natl Acad Sci USA, 108(48), 19193-19198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108243108
[39] Schino, G., & Aureli, F. (2010). A few misunderstandings about reciprocal altruism.Commun Integr Biol, 3(6), 561-563. doi: 10.4161/cib.3.6.12977
[40] Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness.Psychol Sci, 21(3), 349-354. doi: 10.1177/0956797610362647
[41] Strømland E., Tjøtta S., & Torsvik G. (2018). Mutual choice of partner and communication in a repeated prisoner’s dilemma.J Behav Exp Econ, 75, 12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2018.05.002
[42] Sylwester, K., & Roberts, G. (2010). Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games.Biol Letters, 6(5), 659-662. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0209
[43] Sylwester, K., & Roberts, G. (2013). Reputation-based partner choice is an effective alternative to indirect reciprocity in solving social dilemmas.Evol Hum Behav, 34(3), 201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.009
[44] Wei C. L., Zheng L., Che L. P., Cheng X. M., Li L., & Guo X. Y. (2018). Social support modulates neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game.Front Psychol, 9, 182. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00182
[45] Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. (2006). Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game.Polit Res Quart, 59(2), 189-202. doi: 10.1177/106591290605900202
[46] Zhang Y., Kong F. C., Zhong Y. L., & Kou H. (2014). Personality manipulations: Do they modulate facial attractiveness ratings?Pers Indiv Differ, 70, 80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.033
