ZHANG Chengjiao, HU Guangfu, WANG Cheng, PAN Lingyi
Download PDF
(
)
Knowledge map
 
Save
Objective: To investigate the current psychological state and the related factors of Shanghai residents during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic lockdown.
Methods: From May 13 to 20, 2022, 1 402 Shanghai residents, during the COVID-19 epidemic lockdown, were selected by the convenience sampling method, and the self-compiled questionnaire of the demographic information, Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) were used.
Results: In the 1 372 eligible people, the total scores of SCL-90 were between 90 and 430, with a median of 114 (98, 144), and the total average scores of SCL-90 were between 1.00 and 4.78, with a median of 1.27. The average SSRS total score (SD) was 37.45 (7.65). The total score of SCL-90 showed a statistically significant difference in employment status (Z=-3.428) and self-rated level of psychological impact (Z =-20.664). There was a statistically significant difference in the somatization factor score of SCL-90 based on whether COVID-19 vaccination has been administered (Z =-5.130), and in the anxiety factor score based on current residence in a prevention area (Z =-1.802). There was a negative correlation between the total scores of SCL-90 and SSRS (r=-0.294, p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that female (OR=1.373, 95% CI: 1.071 to 1.761), high education level (OR=1.374, 95% CI: 1.039 to 1.818), employment status (OR=1.299, 95% CI: 1.029 to 1.640), and high self-rated level of psychological impact (OR=10.044, 95% CI: 7.834 to 12.876) were risk factors for influencing the psychological state, while a high SSRS total score (OR=0.564, 95%CI: 0.455 to 0.700) was a protective factor.
Conclusion: The psychological state of Shanghai residents during the COVID-19 epidemic lockdown is relatively stable. Females, individuals with higher levels of education, those who are unemployed, and those who has a higher self-rated psychological impact exhibit poorer psychological states. On the other hand, individuals with higher levels of social support have better psychological states.