从善恶意图理解视角探索遏制人际信任危机的路径

黄亮; 李珺翔; 李森; 房英娟; 包兴颖

doi:10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.220104

心理学通讯 >

2021 , Vol. 4 >Issue 1: 44 - 48

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.220104

综述

从善恶意图理解视角探索遏制人际信任危机的路径

黄亮 ,
李珺翔 ,
李森 ,
房英娟 ,
包兴颖

展开

¹闽南师范大学教育科学学院,漳州 363000;
²福建省应用认知与人格重点实验室,漳州 363000;
³漳州卫生职业学院临床医学系,漳州 363000

黄亮,副教授,硕士生导师。2015年7月毕业于天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,获博士学位。2015年8月起任闽南师范大学教育科学学院任教,为心理学学术骨干教师。现兼任福州大学“中国社会信任研究中心”特聘研究员,福建省社会心理学理事。长期从事社会认知（意图理解）与经济决策领域研究。

^*黄亮, yeoo5860@163.com

网络出版日期: 2024-10-16

基金资助

2018年福建省教育科学“十三五”规划重点项目（FJJKCGZ18-770）

收起

An Insight into Exploring How to Curb the Crisis of Interpersonal Trust from the Perspective of Kind and Hostile Intentions Understanding

HUANG Liang ,
LI Junxiang ,
LI Sen ,
FANG Yingjuan ,
BAO Xingying

Expand

¹School of Educational Science, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China;
²Fujian Key Laboratory of Applied Cognition & Personality , Zhangzhou 363000, China;
³Department of Clinical Medicine, Zhangzhou Health Vocational College, Zhangzhou 363000, China

^*HUANG Liang, yeoo5860@163.com

Online published: 2024-10-16

Fold

摘要

因国内鲜有研究从善恶意图理解视角探索如何遏制我国正面临着的人际信任衰落的现实危机,故首先介绍了国内外善恶意图理解的外显式与内敛式研究范式,其次对采用信任博弈范式探索影响人际信任的善恶心理等主观因素的研究进展进行了综述,最后对未来该领域的研究方向进行了展望,可采用行为与认知神经科学等技术,分别从不同人称视角并结合肢体语言或书面语言形式所表达的善恶意图来探索遏制人际信任危机的有效路径。

关键词： 善恶意图理解; 人际信任危机; 社会认知

本文引用格式

黄亮 , 李珺翔 , 李森 , 房英娟 , 包兴颖 . 从善恶意图理解视角探索遏制人际信任危机的路径[J]. 心理学通讯, 2021 , 4(1) : 44 -48 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.220104

Abstract

Few domestic researchers have explored how to curb the ongoing decline of interpersonal trust from the perspective of kind and hostile intentions understanding. The study firstly introduces the explicit and implicit research paradigms of kind and hostile intentions understanding at home and abroad. Secondly, the latest studies adopting the trust game paradigm in economic psychology to explore how the subjective factors such as kind and hostile intentions affect interpersonal trust are reviewed. Finally, the prospect of future research directions in economic psychology is briefly discussed, including the adoption of multiple technologies such as behavioral and cognitive neuroscience methods to explore the effective means of curbing the interpersonal trust crisis from different person perspectives combined with the good and hostile intentions expressed through the verbal or nonverbal form.

Key words： kind and hostile intentions understanding; interpersonal trust crisis; social cognition

参考文献

[1] 窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 聂衍刚. (2018). “乐”于合作: 感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制. 心理学报,50(1), 101-114. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00101
[2] 窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 刘耀中. (2018). 信任还是设防?互动博弈中社会善念对合作行为的促进效应. 心理科学,41(2), 390-396. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180221
[3] 付超, 张振, 何金洲, 黄四林, 仇剑崟, 王益文. (2018). 普遍信任博弈决策的动态过程:来自脑电时频分析的证据. 心理学报,50(3), 317-326. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00317
[4] 甘甜, 石睿, 刘超, 罗跃嘉. (2018). 经颅直流电刺激右侧颞顶联合区对助人意图加工的影响. 心理学报,50(1), 36-46. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00036
[5] 黄亮, 邓兆鑫, 任翰林, 林国耀, 王益文. (2018). 材料生态性和性别因素对理解友好与敌对意图的影响. 心理科学,41(2), 435-440. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180228
[6] 黄亮, 杨雪, 黄志华, 王益文. (2019). 理解双人肢体运动表达的友好和敌对意图的ERP证据. 心理学报,51(5), 557-570. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00557
[7] 王益文, 付超, 任相峰, 林羽中, 郭丰波, 张振, 黄亮, 袁博, 郑玉玮. (2017).自恋人格调节信任博弈的结果评价. 心理学报,49(8), 1080-088. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01080
[8] 王益文, 黄亮, 徐晟, 袁博, 徐艳娇, 李洪玉. (2012). 理解私人意图与交际意图的ERP 证据. 心理学报,44(12), 1618-1627. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01618
[9] 王益文, 黄亮, 张振, 宋娟, 白丽英. (2014). 友好还是敌对?理解互动意图的大脑动态时程. 中国科学(生命科学),44(7), 736-746. doi: 10.1360/052013-20
[10] 辛自强. (2019). 市场化与人际信任变迁. 心理科学进展,27(12), 1951-1966. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01951
[11] 张宁, 张雨青, 吴坎坎. (2011). 信任的心理和神经生理机制. 心理科学,34(5), 1137-1143.
[12] Bracht, J., & Feltovich, N. (2009). Whatever you say, your reputation precedes you: Observation and cheap talk in the trust game.J Public Econ, 93(9), 1036-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.06.004
[13] Colquitt J. A., Scott B. A., & LePine J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance.J Appl Psychol, 92(4), 909-927. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
[14] Decety, J., & Cacioppo, S. (2012). The speed of morality: a high-density electrical neuroimaging study.J Neurophysiol, 108(11), 3068-3072. doi: 10.1152/jn.00473.2012
[15] Escobar M.J., Huepe D., Decety J., Sedeño L., Messow M.K., Baez S., Rivera-Rei Á.,.., Ibánez A. (2014). Brain signatures of moral sensitivity in adolescents with early social deprivation.Sci Rep, 4, 5354. doi: 10.1038/srep05354
[16] Huang L., Wang Y.W., Li J.X., Lin G.Y., Du F.Y., & Chen L.J. (2020). Gender affects understanding kind and hostile intentions based on dyadic body movements.Current psychology, 39(2), 454-463. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00630-6
[17] Kardas M., Shaw A., & Caruso E. M. (2018). How to give away your cake and eat it too: Relinquishing control prompts reciprocal generosity.J Pers Soc Psychol, 115(6), 1054-1074. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000144
[18] Lemmers-Jansen, I. L. J., Krabbendam, L., Amodio D. M., Doesum N. J. V., Veltman D. J., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2018). Giving others the option of choice: an fMRI study on low-cost cooperation.Neurop sychologia, 109, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.009
[19] Lu J., Huang X., Liao C., Guan Q., Qi X., & Cui F. (2020). Social mindfulness shown by individuals with higher status is more pronounced in our brain: ERP evidence.Front Neurosci, 13, 1432. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01432
[20] Mischkowski D., Thielmann I., & Glckner A. (2018). Think it through before making a choice? processing mode does not influence social mindfulness.J Exp Soc Psychol, 74, 85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.001
[21] Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., & Schoorman F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust.Acad Manage Rev, 20, 709-734.
[22] Stanley D. A., Sokol-Hessner P., Fareri D. S., Perino M. T., Delgado M. R., Banaji M. R., & Phelps E. A. (2012). Race and reputation: perceived racial group trustworthiness influences the neural correlates of trust decisions.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 367(1589), 744-753. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0300
[23] Van Doesum N. J., de Vries R. E., Blokland A. A. J., Hill J. M., Kuhlman D. M., Stivers A. W., Tybur J. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2020). Social mindfulness: Prosocial the active way. J Posit Psychol, 15(2), 183-193. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2019.1579352
[24] Van Doesum N. J., Van Lange, D. A. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world.J Pers Soc Psychol, 105(1), 86-103. doi: 10.1037/a0032540
[25] Van Lange, P. A., & Van Doesum, N. J. (2015). Social mindfulness and social hostility.Curr Opin Behav Sci, 3, 18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha. 2014.12.009
[26] Walter H., Adenzato M., Ciaramidaro A., Enrici I., Pia L., & Bara B. G. (2004). Understanding intentions in social interaction: The role of the anterior paracingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci, 16(10), 1854-1863. doi: 10.1162/0898929042947838
[27] Wang Y. W., Huang L., Zhang W., Zhang Z., & Cacioppo S. (2015). Spatio-temporal dynamics of kind versus hostile intentions in the human brain: an electrical neuroimaging study.Soc Neurosci, 10(3), 253-267. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.990641
[28] Wang Y. W., Jing Y., Zhang Z., Lin C., & Valadez E. A. (2017). How dispositional social risk-seeking promotes trusting strangers: Evidence based on brain potentials and neural oscillations.J Exp Psychol Gen, 146(8), 1150-1163. doi: 10.1037/xge0000328

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献