目的： 汉化网络八卦量表（Cybergossip Questionnaire,CGQ）,并检验其在中国大学生群体中的信度和效度。
方法： 采用中英文回译法确定中文版CGQ,并在1 006名大学生中施测。对中文版CGQ进行项目分析、信度分析和结构效度分析,使用网络欺负量表修订版（Revised Cyber Bullying Inventory,RCBI）中的网络欺负（cyberbullying,CB）分量表和网络受欺负（cyber-victimization,CV）分量表、校园负面八卦量表和青少年问题性移动社交媒体使用评估问卷进行效标效度和区分效度的验证。
结果： （1）中文版CGQ包括9个项目,各项目均具有良好的区分度,各项目得分与总分的相关系数在0.485~0.685之间;（2）中文版CGQ具有良好的信度,Cronbach’s α系数为0.885,重测信度为0.716;（3）探索性和验证性因素分析均支持中文版CGQ的单因素结构模型。该量表与效标量表呈显著正相关,相关系数为0.307~0.392,且具有良好的区分效度。
结论： 中文版CGQ具有良好的信度和效度,适宜在中国大学生群体中使用。
Objective: This study aims to translate, adapt, and validate the Cybergossip Questionnaire (CGQ) among Chinese college students.
Methods: The Chinese version of the CGQ was translated using the Chinese-English back-translation method and administered to 1 006 university students. Item analysis, reliability analysis, and structural validity analysis were conducted on the Chinese version of the CGQ. The cyberbullying subscale and the cyber-victimization subscale of the Revised Cyber Bullying Inventory (RCBI), the Negative School Gossip Scale, and the Problematic Mobile Social Media Usage Assessment Questionnaire were used to assess criterion-related and discriminant validity.
Results: (1) The Chinese version of the CGQ included 9 items, all of which showed good discrimination power, with item-total correlation coefficients ranging from 0.485 to 0.685; (2) The Chinese version of CGQ had favorable reliability, with a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.885 and a test-retest reliability of 0.716; (3) Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the single factor model of the Chinese version of CGQ. The questionnaire was positively associated with the criterion variables, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.307 to 0.392, and demonstrated good discriminant validity.
Conclusion: The Chinese version of CGQ has good reliability and validity, making it suitable for use among Chinese college students.
[1] 褚晓伟, 范翠英. (2017). 网络欺负量表修订版在中国初中生群体中的修订及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志,25(6), 1031-1034. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.06.008
[2] 姜永志. (2018). 青少年问题性移动社交媒体使用评估问卷编制. 心理技术与应用,6(10), 613-621. doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2018.10.004
[3] 李泳汉, 常俊杰, 袁梦园, 苏普玉. (2021). 青少年网络欺凌研究进展. 中国学校卫生,42(11), 1751-1756. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.11.035
[4] 刘冬梅, 何云龙, 魏书圆. (2021). 教师应对青少年网络欺凌的策略研究: 基于青少年网络欺凌的调查. 教师教育研究,33(2), 53-58. doi: 10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2021.02.008
[5] 刘仁洁, 夏凌翔, 赵永萍. (2023). 大学生网络欺凌受害潜在类别的发展特点及性别因素的作用. 心理与行为研究, 21(6), 784-791. doi: CNKI:SUN:CLXW.0.2023-06-009
[6] 刘致宏, 张珊珊, 吴涵玉. (2022). 问题性社交网络使用与大学生线上社交焦虑和抑郁症状的关联. 中国学校卫生,43(11), 1699-1703. doi:10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.11.024
[7] 王兴超, 史浩凌. (2024). 负性生活事件与青少年网络欺凌行为的关系: 愤怒反刍的中介作用和网络去抑制的调节作用. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),(1), 93-104; 206.
[8] 吴家钰, 张珊珊. (2022). 大学生网络欺凌与抑郁症状和自杀意念的关联. 中国学校卫生,43(5), 772-775. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.05.031
[9] 中国青年网. (2023年9月1日). 大学生网络社交调查:超五成大学生每天网络社交3小时以上. 中国青年网. https://txs.youth.cn/yc/202309/t20230901_14758499.htm
[10] Alexandrov A., Lilly B., & Babakus E. (2013). The effects of social-and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth.JAMS, 41, 531-546.
[11] Baumeister R. F., Zhang L., & Vohs K. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning.Rev Gen Psychol, 8(2), 111-121. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.111
[12] Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2013). A philosophical and evolutionary approach to cyber-bullying: Social networks and the disruption of sub-moralities.Ethics Inf Technol, 15(4), 285-299.
[13] Cebollero-Salinas A., Orejudo S., Cano-Escoriaza J., & Íñiguez-Berrozpe T. (2022). Cybergossip and problematic internet use in cyberaggression and cybervictimisation among adolescents.Comput Hum Behav, 131, 107230. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107230
[14] Craig W., Boniel-Nissim M., King N., Walsh S. D., Boer M., Donnelly P. D., .. Pickett W. (2020). Social media use and cyber-bullying: A cross-national analysis of young people in 42 countries.J Adolesc Health, 66(6), S100-S108. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.006
[15] Dunbar R. I., Marriott A., & Duncan N. D. (1997). Human conversational behavior.Human nature, 8(3), 231-246.
[16] Eder, D., & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents.Am Sociol Rev, 56(4), 494-508. doi: 10.2307/2096270
[17] Falla D., Ortega-Ruiz R., & Romera E. M. (2021). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the transition from cybergossip to cyberaggression: A longitudinal study.Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(3), 1000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031000
[18] Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions.Rev Gen Psychol, 8(2), 78-99. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78
[19] García-Fernández C. M., Moreno-Moya M., Ortega-Ruiz R., & Romera E. M. (2022). Adolescent involvement in cybergossip: Influence on social adjustment, bullying and cyberbullying.Spanish J Psychol, 25, e6. doi:10.1017/SJP.2022.3
[20] Grosser T. J., Lopez-Kidwell V., & Labianca G. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life.Group Organ Manage, 35(2), 177-212. doi: 10.1177/1059601109360391
[21] López-Pradas I. C., Romera E. M., Casas J. A., & Ortega-Ruiz R. (2017). Cybergossip and cyberbullying during primary school years.Psicología Educativa, 23(2), 73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pse.2017.05.007
[22] Romera E. M., Herrera-López M., Casas J. A., Ruiz R. O., & Del Rey R. (2018). How much do adolescents cybergossip? Scale development and validation in Spain and Colombia.Front Psychol, 9, 1-10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00126
[23] Romera E. M., Camacho A., Ortega-Ruiz R., & Falla D. (2021). Cybergossip, cyberaggression, problematic internet use and family communication.Comunicar, 29(67), 55-64. doi: 10.3916/C67-2021-05
[24] Topcu, Ç., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). The revised cyber bullying inventory (RCBI): Validity and reliability studies. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 5, 660-664. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.161
[25] Wang Q., Hu W., Ouyang X., Chen H., Qi Y., & Jiang Y. (2020). The relationship between negative school gossip and suicide intention in Chinese junior high school students: The mediating effect of academic burnout and gender difference.Child Youth Serv Rev, 117, 105272. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105272
