论著

空巢老人抑郁症状影响因素及风险预测模型的构建与验证

  • 谢保萍 ,
  • 陈世斌 ,
  • 马珺 ,
  • 张曲艺 ,
  • 何勋涛 ,
  • 杨林
展开
  • 1重庆医科大学公共卫生学院/医学与社会发展研究中心/健康领域社会风险预测治理协同创新中心/重庆市新型建设智库公共卫生安全研究中心,重庆 401331;
    2重庆市沙坪坝区陈家桥医院,重庆 401331
谢保萍,重庆医科大学公共卫生专业在读硕士研究生。研究方向:主要为公共卫生。
*马珺majun@cqmu.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2025-03-20

Analysis of Factors Influencing Depressive Symptoms in Empty Nesters and the Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model

  • XIE Baoping ,
  • CHEN Shibin ,
  • MA Jun ,
  • ZHANG Quyi ,
  • HE Xuntao ,
  • YANG Lin
Expand
  • 1School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University/Research Center for Medical and Social Development/Collaborative Innovation Center for Social Risk Prediction and Management in Health Field/Public Health Security Research Center of Chongqing New Construction Think Tank, Chongqing 401331, China;
    2Chenjiaqiao Hospital, Shapingba District, Chongqing 401331, China
*MA Jun,majun@cqmu.edu.cn

Online published: 2025-03-20

摘要

目的: 分析空巢老人抑郁症状影响因素,构建并验证空巢老人抑郁症状风险预测模型。
方法: 基于2020年中国健康与养老追踪调查(China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study,CHARLS)数据库,纳入3 139名空巢老人,采用抑郁自评量表(CESD-10)评估抑郁症状,运用χ2检验及多因素Logistic回归分析得出空巢老人抑郁症状的独立影响因素,随后构建并验证风险预测模型。
结果: 空巢老人抑郁症状发生率为37.4%。Logistic回归分析显示,空巢老人抑郁症状独立影响因素为性别、居住地、受教育水平、是否患有慢性病、生活自理能力和与子女关系满意程度。风险预测模型受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC曲线)的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.727(95%CI 0.709~0.745)。采用bootstrap进行1 000次抽样,得到平均AUC也为0.727。
结论: 构建的空巢老人抑郁症状风险预测模型有良好的区分度和稳定性,可为空巢老人抑郁症状的评估和预防提供一定的参考。

本文引用格式

谢保萍 , 陈世斌 , 马珺 , 张曲艺 , 何勋涛 , 杨林 . 空巢老人抑郁症状影响因素及风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 心理学通讯, 2024 , 7(4) : 242 -251 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.224033

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the factors affecting depressive symptoms in empty nesters and to construct and validate a risk prediction model.
Methods: Based on the 2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) database, 3,139 empty nesters were include. “The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale-10 was used to assess depressive symptoms.” between included and independent influencing factors were identified using the χ² test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A risk prediction model was then constructed and validated.
Results: The prevalence of depressive symptoms among empty nesters was 37.4%, The logistic regression analysis revealed that factors such as gender, place of residence, education level, chronic disease status, ability to live independently, and satisfaction with relationships with children had a significant impact on the likelihood of depressive symptoms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the model was 0.727 (95% CI: 0.709-0.745). The bootstrap method was used to resample the data 1,000 times, yielding a mean AUC of 0.727.
Conclusion: Constructing risk prediction models with good discrimination and calibration can provide some guidance for the assessment and prevention of depressive symptoms in empty nesters.

参考文献

[1] 高山砚. (2019). 妊娠期糖尿病危险因素研究与预测模型构建 (博士学位论文). 中国医科大学,沈阳.
[2] 巩阳, 温红娟, 温扩, 徐梦璐, 章雨婷. (2023). 城市空巢老人社会支持与焦虑的关系:心理韧性的中介作用. 中国老年学杂志,43(20), 5109-5112.
[3] 胡杰容. (2019). 老年抑郁的性别差异及其影响机制. 中华女子学院学报, 31(4), 64-73. doi: 10.13277/j.cnki.jcwu.2019.04.008
[4] 黄伟, 乌日乐, 关鹏, 严杰, 景汇泉. (2016). 中国空巢老人抑郁情况及其影响因素分析. 中国公共卫生,32(9), 1137-1140.
[5] 黄玉君,赵媛媛, 吴贻乐, 孙业桓. (2016). 中国大陆空巢老人SCL-92测试结果的Meta分析. 中华疾病控制杂志,20(1),74-78.doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.01.019.
[6] 姜兆权, 周诗雪, 孙蕊. (2020). 空巢老人人格特征、社会支持与其主观幸福感之间关系研究. 现代预防医学,47(13), 2396-2399.
[7] 刘梦雅, 张利, 张梦, 宋楠楠, 周静蕾. (2023). 中国老年人内在能力与日常生活活动的相关性:基于CHARLS数据. 中国康复理论与实践,29(10), 1140-1146.
[8] 卢灿杰, 周英, 潘胜茂, 施婷, 叶赐君, 卢庆纯, .. 刘婉薇. (2017). 广州市社区老年人抑郁现状及影响因素分析. 护理研究,31(3), 324-326.
[9] 许浩, 陈娜. (2020). 我国城乡失能老人抑郁症状及影响因素差异研究. 现代预防医学,47(22), 4181-4184.
[10] 闫语, 尹文强, 张玉杰, 孟翠香, 李翠玉, 孙艳, .. 陈钟鸣. (2022). 城乡空巢老人抑郁症状及影响因素差异研究. 现代预防医学,49(3), 557-561.
[11] 朱徐乐, 徐林燕, 赵敏, 邬馨益, 陈卓琦, 赵磊, 许丽娟. (2023). 老年人阈下抑郁危险因素分析及风险预测模型的构建与验证. 现代预防医学,50(14), 2639-2644. doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM. 202303097
[12] Boyer S., Trimouillas J., Cardinaud N., Gayot C., Laubarie-Mouret C., Dumoitier N., .. Tchalla A. (2022). Frailty and functional dependence in older population: Lessons from the FREEDOM Limousin-Nouvelle Aquitaine Cohort Study.BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 128. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02834-w
[13] Cheng Y., Yu Q., Li W., & Zuo G. (2022). Impact of main residential locations on depressive symptoms among older adults in China: A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis.Front Public Health, 10, 934940. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.934940
[14] Faisal-Cury A., Ziebold C., Rodrigues D., & Matijasevich A. (2022). Depression underdiagnosis: Prevalence and associated factors. A population-based study. J Psychiatr Res, 151, 157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.04.025
[15] Gao Y., Chen L., Jia Z., Zhao L., Yang Y., & Liu C. (2024). Social participation and health in middle-aged and older empty nesters: A study on gender differences.SSM Popul Health, 25, 101641. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101641
[16] Hakulinen C., Musliner K. L., & Agerbo E. (2019). Bipolar disorder and depression in early adulthood and long-term employment, income, and educational attainment: A nationwide cohort study of 2,390,127 individuals. Depress Anxiety, 36(11), 1080-1088. doi: 10.1002/da.22956
[17] He W., Jiang L., Ge X., Ye J., Yang N., Li M., .. Han X. (2020). Quality of life of empty-nest elderly in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychol Health Med, 25(2), 131-147. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1695863
文章导航

/

〈 〉