综述

公务员创新行为影响因素的研究热点与展望——基于WOS数据库的可视化分析

  • 李莉 ,
  • 李希
展开
  • 西北大学公共管理学院,西安 710127
李莉,管理学博士,西北大学公共管理学院讲师、硕士生导师,西北大学公共行政研究院研究员,研究方向为行为公共管理。
*李希1144894833@qq.com

网络出版日期: 2025-03-20

基金资助

陕西省社会科学基金项目(2022R062);陕西省哲学社会科学研究专项年度项目(2025YB0342)

The Research Focuses and Prospects of Influencing Factors of Civil Servants’ Innovative Behavior: Visualization Analysis Based on WOS Database

  • LI Li ,
  • LI Xi
Expand
  • School of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China
*LI Xi,1144894833@qq.com

Online published: 2025-03-20

摘要

公务员创新行为对提升公共部门的服务效能和运行效率具有重要意义。为回应实践需求,学界近年来对公务员创新行为的研究相对活跃,尤其注重其影响因素的研究。文章基于CiteSpace可视化分析,对Web of Science(WOS)数据库中以“公务员创新行为”为主题的研究论文进行文献计量分析,绘制公务员创新行为影响因素研究的知识图谱。分析结果显示:(1)经过近十年的发展,公务员创新行为影响因素的研究数量总体呈上升趋势,现已成为积极组织行为学的一大重要主题,且拥有一批具有一定学术影响力的核心作者和研究机构。(2)从研究热点来看,现有研究的高频关键词主要集中于变革型领导与工作满意度,并且主要从组织层面(组织情境、领导风格)和个人层面(情感、动机和特质)探讨公务员创新行为的影响机制。(3)在研究趋势上,相关研究呈现出阶段性特征:2011至2015年侧重组织层面因素(如组织氛围、领导风格等)对公务员创新行为的影响研究;2016至2017年以探索影响公务员创新行为的中介因素(如心理授权、工作投入等)为重点;2018年至今的研究热点聚焦于公务员个人层面的因素(如自我效能感、工作满意度等)对其创新行为的影响。(4)未来研究可以从研究对象、研究方法、研究内容上拓展和深化, 以丰富公务员创新行为的研究体系。

本文引用格式

李莉 , 李希 . 公务员创新行为影响因素的研究热点与展望——基于WOS数据库的可视化分析[J]. 心理学通讯, 2024 , 7(4) : 252 -261 . DOI: 10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.224034

Abstract

Civil servants' innovative behavior is of great significance to improving the service effectiveness and operation efficiency of the public sector. In response to practical needs, academic circles have been relatively active in the study of civil servants' innovative behavior in recent years, paying particular attention to the influencing factors. Based on CiteSpace visual analysis, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of research papers on the theme of "civil servant innovation behavior" in the Web of Science database and constructed a knowledge graph of the research on the influencing factors. The results show that: (1) After nearly ten years of development, the research on the innovative behavior of civil servants is on the rise in general, and has now become an important topic of positive organizational behavior, with a group of core authors and research institutions exerting considerable academic influence. (2) From the perspective of research hotspots, current studies primarily focus on transformational leadership and job satisfaction as high-frequency keywords. The influencing mechanisms of civil servant innovation behavior are mainly explored from the organizational level (e.g., organizational environment, leadership style) and the individual level (e.g., emotions, motivation, personality traits). (3) In terms of research trends, studies in this field have shown distinct phases: From 2011 to 2015, research mainly focused on how organizational-level factors (such as organizational climate and leadership style) influence civil servant innovation behavior. From 2016 to 2017, the focus shifted toward exploring mediating factors (such as psychological empowerment and job engagement) that affect civil servant innovation behavior. From 2018 to the present, research has increasingly focused on individual-level factors, including self-efficacy and job satisfaction, and their impact on innovation behavior. (4) Looking ahead, future research can be further expanded and refined in terms of research subjects, methodologies, and content to enrich the study framework of civil servant innovation behavior.

参考文献

[1] 刘敏娟、张学福、颜蕴. (2016).基于核心词、突变词与新生词的学科主题演化方法研究,情报杂志,12.
[2] 李正东、姜金明. (2022).组织领导风格研究评述与展望——框架梳理与动态演化,科学与管理,42 (6), 52-61.
[3] 谭新雨. (2021). 公务员创新行为: 文献述评与研究展望. 公共行政评论, 14(2), 195-227.
[4] 颜昌武、杨郑媛. (2020). 我国基本公共服务均等化研究的知识图谱——基于CiteSpace的可视化计量分析,中国延安干部学院学报,13(04), 10. doi: 10.16223/j.cnki.cn61-1456/c.2020.04.003.
[5] 卓越、孟蕾、林敏娟. (2011).构建整体性绩效管理框架:西方政府绩效管理的新视点,中国行政管理,4, 5.
[6] Akinci G., Alpkan L., Yıldız B., & Karacay G. (2022). The link between ambidextrous leadership and innovative work behavior in a military organization: The mediating role of climate for innovation.Sustainability, 14(2).
[7] Amjad I., Shakil A. M., & Tahira N. (2023). Does servant leadership predict innovative behaviour above and beyond transformational leadership? Examining the role of affective commitment and creative self-efficacy.Leadership Org Dev J, 44(1), 34-51. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-01-2022-0016
[8] Asif M., Qing M., Hameed R., & Shahzad K. (2023). Ethical leadership and employee innovation: a moderated mediation model in the public sector.J Bus Ethics, 180(2).
[9] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
[10] Bass B. M.(1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
[11] Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates.J Organ Behav, 14(2), 103-118. doi:10.1002/job.4030140202
[12] Cho, Y. J.& Song, H. J. (2020). How to facilitate innovative behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: evidence from public employees in Korea.Public Personnel Management, (1), 009102602097757.doi: 10.1177/0091026020977571
[13] Demircioglu, M. A. (2019). The effects of organizational and demographic context for innovation implementation in public organizations.Public Manag Rev, 22(12), 1852-1875. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1668467
[14] Fernández, S., & Wise, L. R. (2010). An exploration of why public organizations ‘ingest’ innovations.Public Admin, 88(4), 979-998. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01857.x
[15] Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C. & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy.Acad Manage J, 52(4), 765-778.
[16] Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
[17] Hair A. A., Maslinda H., Iskandar Z. R., & Suhana S. (2020). Formation of civil servants’ creativity through transformative leadership. J Manag Dev, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 499-515. doi: 10.1108/JMD-04-2019-0142
[18] Hambrick, D. C. & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers.Acad Manage Rev, 9(2), 193-206. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.1982.4976402
[19] Hansen, J. A., & Pihl-Thingvad, S. (2019). Managing employee innovative behaviour through transformational and transactional leadership styles.Public Manag Rev, 21(6), 918-944. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1544272
[20] Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.Am Psychol, 44(3), 513-524. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513
[21] Jun, K., & Lee, J. (2023). Transformational leadership and followers’ innovative behavior: Roles of commitment to change and organizational support for creativity.Behav Sci, 13(4), 320. doi:10.3390/bs13040320
[22] Khaola, P., & Coldwell, D. (2019). ‘please lead me, my commitment is low’: Interactive effects of commitment and leadership on innovative behaviour.Int J Innov Manag, 23(2), 19. doi: 10.1142/S1363919619500154
[23] Lee, G., & Kim, C. (2024). Antecedents of innovative behavior in public organizations: The role of public service motivation, organizational commitment, and perceived innovative culture.Front Psychol, 15, 1378217. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378217
[24] Luthans, F. & Avolio, B.J. (2003). Authentic leadership: a positive developmental approach. positive organizational scholarship(pp. 241-261). San Francisco: Barrettt-Koehler.
[25] Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment.Hum Resour Manage R, 1(1), 61-89. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
[26] Mubarak N., Khan J., Yasmin R., & Osmadi A. (2021). The impact of a proactive personality on innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and transformational leadership.Leadership Org Dev J, 42(7), 989-1003. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2020-0518
[27] Mutonyi B. R., Slåtten T., & Lien G. (2020). Empowering leadership, work group cohesiveness, individual learning orientation and individual innovative behaviour in the public sector: Empirical evidence from Norway.Int J Public Leaders, 16(2), 175-197.
[28] Nazir S., Qun W., Hui L., & Shafi A. (2018). Influence of social exchange relationships on affective commitment and innovative behavior: Role of perceived organizational support.Sustainability, 10(12).
[29] Park, S., & Jo, S. J. (2018). The impact of proactivity, leader-member exchange, and climate for innovation on innovative behavior in the Korean government sector.Leadership Org Dev J, 39(1), 130-149. doi:10.1108/lodj-09-2016-0216
[30] Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service.Public Admin Rev, 50(3), 367. doi:10.2307/976618
[31] Rosing K., Frese M., & Bausch A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership.Leadership Quart, 22(5), 956-974. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
[32] Safeya A., Shaker B. M., & Faridahwati M. S. (2023). How having job impact leads to employee innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model of servant leadership and work meaningfulness.Int J Public Sect Ma, 36(4-5), 382-403.
[33] Sarwar U., Zamir S., Fazal K., Hong Y., & Yong Q. Z. (2022). “Impact of leadership styles on innovative performance of female leaders in Pakistani Universities”.PLoS One, 17(5), e0266956. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266956
[34] Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace.Acad Manage J, 37(3), 580-607.
[35] Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation.Acad Manage Rev, 15(4), 666-681. doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310926
[36] Wang, Q., & Khan, M. S. (2024). Does servant leadership affect public employees’ innovative behavior? the mediating role of organizational identity.Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(2), e06547. doi:10.24857/rgsa.v18n2-128
文章导航

/

〈 〉