目的：检验以系统取向督导模型（systemic approach to supervision,SAS）为框架的督导能力量表（修订版）在中国大陆心理咨询督导师中的信度和效度。
方法：采用方便取样法,通过问卷星平台分两阶段收集心理咨询督导师的相关数据。问卷经前后2批收集,取样时间间隔6个月以上,测量心理咨询督导师的督导能力。第一阶段采用督导能力量表（测试版,77题）从上海、长沙、杭州三地回收224份有效问卷,用于项目分析和探索性因素分析;第二阶段采用督导能力量表（修订版,44题）从全国各地区回收276份问卷,用于验证性因素分析、信度检验以及其他效度指标的验证。校标效度问卷为督导工作联盟问卷、自我反思与洞察力量表及自我中心量表。
结果：最终修订版的督导能力量表保留了27个题项,包括督导关系、督导功能与任务和督导情境脉络3个维度,可解释总体方差的58.822%。各维度内部一致性Cronbach's α系数为0.653~0.747;验证性因素分析表明量表模型拟合较好（χ2=743.692, df=321, χ2/df=2.317, TLI=0.901, IFL=0.911, RMSEA=0.069, SRMR=0.042, CFI=0.911, GFI=0.833）;各维度间的相关以及与督导效果校标之间的相关系数r为0.552~0.716,均存在统计学意义（p<0.001）。
结论：督导能力量表（修订版）具有良好的信度和效度,可作为临床督导能力的有效测评工具。
Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Supervisory Ability Scale (revised version), based on the Systematic Approach to Supervision (SAS) model, among psychological supervisors in China's mainland.
Methods: A convenience sampling method was used in this study to collect relevant data on psychological supervisors in two stages through the online questionnaire platform Wenjuanxing. The two waves of data collection were conducted more than six months apart. In the first stage, item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted using the 224 valid responses obtained from Shanghai, Changsha, and Hangzhou with the 77-item version of the Supervisory Ability Scale. In the second stage, confirmatory factor analysis was performed using the 276 valid responses collected from different regions across China with the 44-item version.
Results: The final revised version of the scales had a total of 27 items, covering supervision relationship, supervision functions and tasks, and supervision context, explaining 58.822% of the overall variance. The internal consistency coefficients of each dimension ranged from 0.653 to 0.747. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the scale model fit well (χ2=743.692, df=321, χ2/df=2.317, TLI=0.901,IFL=0.911, RMSEA=0.069, SRMR=0.042, CFI=0.911, GFI=0.833); The correlations between various dimensions and the criterion-related measures were all significant (r=0.552-0.716).
Conclusion: The Supervisory Ability Scale (revised version) has good reliability and validity and can be used as an effective tool for clinical supervisory ability assessment.
[1] 刘健, 刘露, 陈秀红, 张冄冄, 杨翠茹. (2018). 自我反思与洞察力量表中文版在精神障碍患者中应用的效度和信度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 32(5), 369-374.
[2] 吕韵, 刘梦云, 顾天意, 朱旭. (2024). 临床与咨询心理学专业人员胜任力的评估方法. 心理科学, 47(1), 237-245. doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240128
[3] 宗敏, 吕大为, 贾晓明. (2018). 实习心理咨询师及其督导师对督导期待过程的定性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 32(10), 822-828.
[4] 徐西森. (2005). SAS取向谘商督导能力评量表之编制研究. 中国辅导学报, 18, 153-201.
[5] 李成志, 谭莉娜, 莫圣开, 韦秋玲, 唐峥华. (2023). 广西高校心理咨询从业者接受心理督导的现状及其影响因素分析. 心理月刊, 18(8), 215-218. doi: 10.19738/j.cnki.psy.2023.08.067
[6] 杨妲. (2020). 督导工作联盟问卷的编制(硕士学位论文). 西南交通大学, 成都.
[7] 林令瑜, 钱铭怡, 王浩宇, 庄淑婕. (2017). 国内心理咨询一对一督导的伦理实践情况调查. 中国心理卫生杂志, 31(1), 25-29.
[8] 樊富珉, 黄蘅玉, 冯杰. (2002). 心理咨询与治疗工作中督导的意义与作用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 16(9), 648-652.
[9] 王东美, 钱铭怡, 樊富珉, 江光荣. (2022). 中国临床与咨询心理学百年发展简史(1921—2021). 中国临床心理学杂志, 30(2), 454-460. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.02.041
[10] 简单心理, 第一财经商业数据中心. (2024). 2023—2024心理健康及行业人群洞察报告:心理咨询师执业现状及群体特点. 2024-03-20取自 https://www.sohu.com/a/765586154_121123709
[11] 贾晓明. (2014). 当代中国心理咨询与心理治疗的反思与探讨. 北京理工大学出版社..
[12] 中国心理学会临床与咨询心理学专业机构和专业人员注册系统. (2025. 注册人员查询. 2025-06-20 取自2025). 注册人员查询. 2025-06-20 取自http://www.chinacpb.net/public/index.php/index/index/zcrycx.html
[13] 周蜜, 赵嘉路, 贾晓明. (2022). 高校危机干预督导中受督导者对督导师的期待.中国临床心理学杂志, 30(6): 1492-1496,1503. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.06.045.
[14] Bennett, R E. (2019) 教育测量的未来趋势.教育测量与评价, 3, 3-14,18. doi: 10.16518/j.cnki.emae.2019.03.001
[15] Fitch J. C., Pistole M. C., & Gunn J. E. (2010). The bonds of development: An attachment-caregiving model of supervision.Clin Superv, 29(1), 20-34. doi: 10.1080/07325221003730319
[16] Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Supervision as pedagogy: Attending to its essential instructional and learning processes.Clin Superv, 33(1), 82-99. doi: 10.1080/07325223.2014.918914
[17] Grant A. M., Franklin J., & Langford P. (2002). The Self-reflection and Insight Scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness.Soc Behav Personal, 30(8), 821-835. doi:10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821
[18] Holloway, E. L. (1987). Developmental models of supervision: Is it development?.Prof Psychol-Res Pr, 18(3), 209-216.
[19] James I. A., Milne D., Marie-Blackburn I., & Armstrong P. (2007). Conducting successful supervision: Novel elements towards an integrative approach.Behav Cogn Psychoth, 35(2), 191. doi:10.1017/s1352465806003407
[20] Loganbill C., Hardy E., & Delworth U. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model.Couns Psychologist, 10(1), 3-42. doi:10.1177/001100 0082101002
[21] Ober A. M., Granello D. H., & Henfield M. S. (2009). A synergistic model to enhance multicultural competence in supervision.Couns Educ Superv, 48(3), 204-221. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2009.tb00075.x
[22] Page, S., & Wosket, V. (2001). Supervising the counsellor: A cyclical model., 2nd ed. Brunner-Routledge; APA PsycInfo.
[23] Pearson, Q. M. (2006). Psychotherapy-driven supervision: Integrating counseling theories into role-based supervision.J Ment Health Couns, 28(3), 241-252.
[24] Silva, S., & Sousa, D. (2022). Existential psychotherapy supervision: The supervisor’s perspective.J Humanist Psychol, 62(3), 397-417. doi:10.1177/0022167818802905
[25] Tajmirriyahi M., Ta V. P., & Ickes W. (2020). Measuring egocentrism as a trait-like personality attribute: The development and validation of the Egocentrism Scale.Psychol Stud, 65(4), 481-488. doi:10.1007/s12646-020-00586-4
[26] Watkins, C. E. (2017). Convergence in psychotherapy supervision: A common factors, common processes, common practices perspective. J Psychother Integr, 27(2), 140-152. doi:10.1037/int0000040
